From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sarah Newman Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: bridge: add max_fdb_count Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2017 20:54:05 -0800 Message-ID: <257f3f74-8761-35ef-3b43-e2705d8510a6@prgmr.com> References: <1510774027-2468-1-git-send-email-srn@prgmr.com> <20171115120452.3b426442@xeon-e3> <20171116022540.GF2130@lunn.ch> <6c916129-5679-32bb-a3f1-46cc02c3683d@lab.ntt.co.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Toshiaki Makita , Andrew Lunn , Stephen Hemminger Return-path: Received: from mail.prgmr.com ([71.19.149.6]:45796 "EHLO mail.prgmr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932420AbdKPEyG (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Nov 2017 23:54:06 -0500 In-Reply-To: <6c916129-5679-32bb-a3f1-46cc02c3683d@lab.ntt.co.jp> Content-Language: en-US Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 11/15/2017 08:05 PM, Toshiaki Makita wrote: > On 2017/11/16 11:25, Andrew Lunn wrote: >>> Also what do the vendors using bridge for L2 offload to switch think? >> >> The Marvell L2 switches which DSA supports have 8K FDB/MDB entries. So >> maybe 1024 is a bit low? > > How about U32_MAX by default since it is currently not restricted. > (assuming the field will be changed to u32 as per Stephen's feedback). > > Otherwise users may suffer from unexpected behavior change by updating > kernel? > U32_MAX seems like much too high a default to be helpful to a typical user. How many devices are realistically on a single bridge in the wild? Double that seems like a reasonable default. Additionally, since the exact limit seems controversial, it can be made a configuration parameter. What about the rest? --Sarah