From: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
To: Ido Schimmel <idosch@idosch.org>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, jiri@mellanox.com, alexpe@mellanox.com,
mlxsw@mellanox.com, Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 08/17] netdevsim: Adjust accounting for IPv6 multipath notifications
Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2019 19:27:13 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <25bb06eb-bd2a-de85-9903-19215703363a@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190615140751.17661-9-idosch@idosch.org>
On 6/15/19 8:07 AM, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/net/netdevsim/fib.c b/drivers/net/netdevsim/fib.c
> index 83ba5113210d..6e5498ef3855 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/netdevsim/fib.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/netdevsim/fib.c
> @@ -137,19 +137,20 @@ static int nsim_fib_rule_event(struct nsim_fib_data *data,
> }
>
> static int nsim_fib_account(struct nsim_fib_entry *entry, bool add,
> + unsigned int num_rt,
> struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> {
> int err = 0;
>
> if (add) {
> - if (entry->num < entry->max) {
> - entry->num++;
> + if (entry->num + num_rt < entry->max) {
> + entry->num += num_rt;
> } else {
> err = -ENOSPC;
> NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Exceeded number of supported fib entries");
> }
> } else {
> - entry->num--;
> + entry->num -= num_rt;
> }
>
> return err;
> @@ -159,14 +160,20 @@ static int nsim_fib_event(struct nsim_fib_data *data,
> struct fib_notifier_info *info, bool add)
> {
> struct netlink_ext_ack *extack = info->extack;
> + struct fib6_entry_notifier_info *fen6_info;
> + unsigned int num_rt = 1;
> int err = 0;
>
> switch (info->family) {
> case AF_INET:
> - err = nsim_fib_account(&data->ipv4.fib, add, extack);
> + err = nsim_fib_account(&data->ipv4.fib, add, num_rt, extack);
> break;
> case AF_INET6:
> - err = nsim_fib_account(&data->ipv6.fib, add, extack);
> + fen6_info = container_of(info, struct fib6_entry_notifier_info,
> + info);
> + if (fen6_info->multipath_rt)
> + num_rt = fen6_info->nsiblings + 1;
> + err = nsim_fib_account(&data->ipv6.fib, add, num_rt, extack);
The intention of the original patch was to account for a multipath route
as 1 entry, not N where N is the number of paths.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-17 1:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-15 14:07 [PATCH net-next 00/17] mlxsw: Improve IPv6 route insertion rate Ido Schimmel
2019-06-15 14:07 ` [PATCH net-next 01/17] netlink: Document all fields of 'struct nl_info' Ido Schimmel
2019-06-17 1:16 ` David Ahern
2019-06-15 14:07 ` [PATCH net-next 02/17] netlink: Add field to skip in-kernel notifications Ido Schimmel
2019-06-17 1:17 ` David Ahern
2019-06-17 6:37 ` Ido Schimmel
2019-06-15 14:07 ` [PATCH net-next 03/17] ipv6: Extend notifier info for multipath routes Ido Schimmel
2019-06-17 1:22 ` David Ahern
2019-06-17 6:46 ` Ido Schimmel
2019-06-15 14:07 ` [PATCH net-next 04/17] mlxsw: spectrum_router: Ignore IPv6 multipath notifications Ido Schimmel
2019-06-15 14:07 ` [PATCH net-next 05/17] netdevsim: " Ido Schimmel
2019-06-15 14:07 ` [PATCH net-next 06/17] ipv6: Add IPv6 multipath notifications for add / replace Ido Schimmel
2019-06-17 13:01 ` David Ahern
2019-06-15 14:07 ` [PATCH net-next 07/17] ipv6: Add IPv6 multipath notification for route delete Ido Schimmel
2019-06-17 13:03 ` David Ahern
2019-06-15 14:07 ` [PATCH net-next 08/17] netdevsim: Adjust accounting for IPv6 multipath notifications Ido Schimmel
2019-06-17 1:27 ` David Ahern [this message]
2019-06-17 6:49 ` Ido Schimmel
2019-06-15 14:07 ` [PATCH net-next 09/17] mlxsw: spectrum_router: Remove processing of IPv6 append notifications Ido Schimmel
2019-06-15 14:07 ` [PATCH net-next 10/17] mlxsw: spectrum_router: Prepare function to return errors Ido Schimmel
2019-06-15 14:07 ` [PATCH net-next 11/17] mlxsw: spectrum_router: Pass multiple routes to work item Ido Schimmel
2019-06-15 14:07 ` [PATCH net-next 12/17] mlxsw: spectrum_router: Adjust IPv6 replace logic to new notifications Ido Schimmel
2019-06-15 14:07 ` [PATCH net-next 13/17] mlxsw: spectrum_router: Pass array of routes to route handling functions Ido Schimmel
2019-06-15 14:07 ` [PATCH net-next 14/17] mlxsw: spectrum_router: Add / delete multiple IPv6 nexthops Ido Schimmel
2019-06-15 14:07 ` [PATCH net-next 15/17] mlxsw: spectrum_router: Create IPv6 multipath routes in one go Ido Schimmel
2019-06-15 14:07 ` [PATCH net-next 16/17] ipv6: Stop sending in-kernel notifications for each nexthop Ido Schimmel
2019-06-17 13:06 ` David Ahern
2019-06-15 14:07 ` [PATCH net-next 17/17] selftests: mlxsw: Add a test for FIB offload indication Ido Schimmel
2019-06-16 21:04 ` [PATCH net-next 00/17] mlxsw: Improve IPv6 route insertion rate David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=25bb06eb-bd2a-de85-9903-19215703363a@gmail.com \
--to=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=alexpe@mellanox.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=idosch@idosch.org \
--cc=idosch@mellanox.com \
--cc=jiri@mellanox.com \
--cc=mlxsw@mellanox.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).