netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nick Child <nnac123@linux.ibm.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, haren@linux.ibm.com, ricklind@us.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] ibmvnic: Do not reset dql stats on NON_FATAL err
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2023 10:45:38 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <25e42e2a-4662-e00a-e274-a6887aaae9d6@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230624151911.7442620c@kernel.org>



On 6/24/23 17:19, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Jun 2023 14:03:32 -0500 Nick Child wrote:
>> +		if (adapter->reset_reason == VNIC_RESET_NON_FATAL)
>> +			clear_bit(__QUEUE_STATE_STACK_XOFF,
>> +				  &netdev_get_tx_queue(netdev, i)->state);
> 
> Why are you trying to clear this bit?
> 
> If the completions will still come the bit will be cleared (or not)
> during completion handling (netdev_tx_completed_queue() et al.)
> 
> Drivers shouldn't be poking into queue state bits directly.

Most likely, yes there could be some bytes that will get a completion 
which would clear this bit.

That being said, it is also possible that all bytes sent to the NIC are 
already completed. In which case we would not get a completion. The 
ibmvnic driver sends its skb's to the NIC in batches, it makes a call to 
netdev_tx_sent_queue on every time an skb is added to the batch. This is 
not necessarily every-time that the batch is sent to the NIC.

I am not sure what number of bytes causes dql to set 
__QUEUE_STATE_STACK_XOFF but I do know that it is possible for up to 15 
skb's to be sitting in the queues batch. If there are no outstanding 
bytes on the NIC (ie not expecting a tx completion) and the internal 
batch has 15 references per queue, is this enough to enforce dql and set 
__QUEUE_STATE_STACK_XOFF? If so, then we must clear 
__QUEUE_STATE_STACK_XOFF when resetting.

I had a feeling this would raise some eyebrows. The main intent is to do 
everything that netdev_tx_reset_queue() does besides resetting 
statistics. Setting a "*STACK*" flag in driver code feels wrong 
(especially since a *DRV* flag exists) but I could not find an 
appropriate upper-level function. I suppose an alternative is to read 
this flag after the device finishes the reset and sending the batch if 
it is set. Is this any better?

As always, thanks for the review.
Nick

  reply	other threads:[~2023-06-26 15:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-06-22 19:03 [PATCH net] ibmvnic: Do not reset dql stats on NON_FATAL err Nick Child
2023-06-23  7:52 ` Simon Horman
2023-06-23 12:41   ` Simon Horman
2023-06-23 12:24 ` Rick Lindsley
2023-06-24 22:19 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-06-26 15:45   ` Nick Child [this message]
2023-06-26 17:33     ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-06-26 19:23       ` Nick Child
2023-06-26 19:06   ` Rick Lindsley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=25e42e2a-4662-e00a-e274-a6887aaae9d6@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=nnac123@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=haren@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ricklind@us.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).