From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jason Wang Subject: Re: XDP offload to hypervisor Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2017 11:03:46 +0800 Message-ID: <286d054e-70bf-e0ca-8db6-f2f3ec12d963@redhat.com> References: <20170123230727-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <20170124010201.GB60699@ast-mbp.thefacebook.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: John Fastabend , john.r.fastabend@intel.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net To: Alexei Starovoitov , "Michael S. Tsirkin" Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:45310 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751150AbdAYDDx (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Jan 2017 22:03:53 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20170124010201.GB60699@ast-mbp.thefacebook.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 2017年01月24日 09:02, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > Frankly I don't understand the whole virtio nit picking that was happening. > imo virtio+xdp by itself is only useful for debugging, development and testing > of xdp programs in a VM. The discussion about performance of virtio+xdp > will only be meaningful when corresponding host part is done. Maybe not, consider you may have dpdk backend on host. Thanks