From: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
brking@linux.vnet.ibm.com, ossthema@de.ibm.com,
osstklei@de.ibm.com, raisch@de.ibm.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] ehea: Allocate stats buffer with GFP_KERNEL
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 10:49:41 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <29190.1282153781@death> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1282140652.2194.90.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> wrote:
>Le jeudi 01 juillet 2010 à 22:48 -0700, David Miller a écrit :
>> From: Brian King <brking@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 16:59:12 -0500
>>
>> >
>> > Since ehea_get_stats calls ehea_h_query_ehea_port, which
>> > can sleep, we can also sleep when allocating a page in
>> > this function. This fixes some memory allocation failure
>> > warnings seen under low memory conditions.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Brian King <brking@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>
>> Applied to net-next-2.6
>> --
>
>I believe there is a problem with this patch and/or bonding.
>
>If we say ndo_get_stats() methods are allowed to sleep, then
>bond_get_stats() should be updated, because it currently calls
>dev_get_stats() from a read_lock_bh(&bond->lock); section.
>
>Are we allowed to sleep inside a read_lock_bh() ?
Nope.
And bonding's not the only call site that holds a lock over the
call to ndo_get_stats / dev_get_stats; net/core/net-sysfs.c:netstat_show
does it as well.
I presume that bonding and netstat_show are holding a lock to
keep a list of interfaces from changing, since there's no other locking
that's guaranteed to be held for a call to dev_get_stats.
In any event, ehea is doing an hcall to the hypervisor, which
may return "long busy," after which ehea sleeps for however long the
hypervisor told it to wait before trying again.
So, the real question is whether the ndo_get_stats* functions
are permitted to sleep. If they are, then bonding and netstat_show both
need to change. If not, then ehea needs to change. Ehea is probably
not alone in this; I poked around a bit, and it looks like mlx4 may also
sleep in ndo_get_stats.
-J
---
-Jay Vosburgh, IBM Linux Technology Center, fubar@us.ibm.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-18 17:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-30 21:59 [PATCH 1/1] ehea: Allocate stats buffer with GFP_KERNEL Brian King
2010-07-02 5:48 ` David Miller
2010-08-18 14:10 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-08-18 17:49 ` Jay Vosburgh [this message]
2010-08-19 7:53 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=29190.1282153781@death \
--to=fubar@us.ibm.com \
--cc=brking@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ossthema@de.ibm.com \
--cc=osstklei@de.ibm.com \
--cc=raisch@de.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).