From: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
To: Yogesh Gaur <yogeshgaur.83@gmail.com>, nic_swsd@realtek.com
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Javen Xu <javen_xu@realsil.com.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v4] r8169: don't enable chip LTR when the platform has not enabled LTR
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2026 21:05:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <29341dad-f1a1-41c0-83a5-3f7190a42d95@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260914130050.304-1-yogeshgaur.83@gmail.com>
On 14.09.2026 15:00, Yogesh Gaur wrote:
> rtl_enable_ltr() programs the MAC to generate LTR messages - ALDPS_LTR_EN,
> LTR_SNOOP_EN, LTR_OBFF_LOCK_EN, plus LINK_SPEED_CHANGE_EN on
> RTL8125/RTL8126/RTL8127 - and rtl_hw_aspm_clkreq_enable() calls it on
> every ASPM enable, then goes on to let the chip trigger L1.2.
>
> The only gate is tp->aspm_manageable, which records that the OS is allowed
> to control ASPM. It says nothing about LTR. LTR is a separate PCIe
> capability that only works if every device on the path to the root port
> supports it. The PCI core works that out in pci_configure_ltr() and
> records the result in pci_dev->ltr_path; per PCIe r6.0 sec 7.5.3.16 a
> function must not issue LTR messages while LTR Mechanism Enable is clear.
>
> So on a platform whose hierarchy has no LTR path, the driver tells the
> chip to start sending LTR messages nothing will honour, and ties ALDPS -
> the PHY's link-down power saving - to them. A report against RTL8125B
> (rev 05, firmware rtl8125b-2_0.0.2) in a mini PC shows the effect: 291
> link down/up transitions in one eight-hour boot, with repeated downshifts
> to 100Mbps, against four transitions at boot and then a stable link on
> the kernel before the LTR change.
>
> Gate the chip's LTR programming on pci_dev->ltr_path. That field exists
> only when CONFIG_PCIEASPM is enabled, so the test needs a preprocessor
> guard rather than IS_ENABLED(). With CONFIG_PCIEASPM=n the PCI core's
> pci_configure_ltr() is a stub and LTR is enabled nowhere, so the chip
> must not issue LTR messages in that configuration either.
>
> Note this does change CONFIG_PCIEASPM=n builds, which used to program
> chip LTR unconditionally: pci_disable_link_state() is a stub that returns
> success there, so tp->aspm_manageable ends up set.
>
> Fixes: 9ab94a32af70 ("r8169: enable LTR support")
> Assisted-by: LLM
> Signed-off-by: Yogesh Gaur <yogeshgaur.83@gmail.com>
> ---
> v4:
> - Drop closes line.
> v3: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260911131352.2036-1-yogeshgaur.83@gmail.com/
> v2: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260910130140.910-1-yogeshgaur.83@gmail.com/
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260909110554.1977-1-yogeshgaur.83@gmail.com/
>
> NOT VERIFIED ON HARDWARE. The causal claim above is
> reasoned from the register writes.
>
> Compile-tested only: drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.o, x86_64
> defconfig + R8169=m, built W=1 clean with both CONFIG_PCIEASPM=y and
> CONFIG_PCIEASPM=n.
>
> drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c
> index ec4fc21fa21f..c305a8f19551 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c
> @@ -3037,6 +3037,18 @@ static void rtl_disable_exit_l1(struct rtl8169_private *tp)
>
> static void rtl_enable_ltr(struct rtl8169_private *tp)
> {
> + /* The chip must not issue LTR messages unless LTR is enabled for the
> + * whole path up to the root port. pci_configure_ltr() works that out
> + * and records the result in pci_dev->ltr_path, which exists only with
> + * CONFIG_PCIEASPM; without it the PCI core never enables LTR anywhere.
> + */
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PCIEASPM
> + if (!tp->pci_dev->ltr_path)
> + return;
> +#else
> + return;
> +#endif
> +
> switch (tp->mac_version) {
> case RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_80:
> r8168_mac_ocp_write(tp, 0xcdd0, 0x9003);
Reviewed-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-15 19:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-10 13:01 [PATCH net v2] r8169: don't enable chip LTR when the platform has not enabled LTR Yogesh Gaur
2026-09-10 19:33 ` Heiner Kallweit
2026-09-11 13:00 ` Yogesh Gaur
2026-09-11 13:14 ` Heiner Kallweit
2026-09-14 12:46 ` Yogesh Gaur
2026-09-11 13:13 ` [PATCH net v3] " Yogesh Gaur
2026-09-14 13:00 ` [PATCH net v4] " Yogesh Gaur
2026-09-15 19:05 ` Heiner Kallweit [this message]
2026-09-16 13:02 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-17 13:40 ` Paolo Abeni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=29341dad-f1a1-41c0-83a5-3f7190a42d95@gmail.com \
--to=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=javen_xu@realsil.com.cn \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nic_swsd@realtek.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=yogeshgaur.83@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox