From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Howells Subject: Re: [PATCH] CONFIG_PACKET_MMAP should depend on MMU Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 10:42:53 +0100 Message-ID: <29619.1176975773@redhat.com> References: <6d6a94c50704181759w12eee19agcb56058b8261dded@mail.gmail.com> <200704091146.32346.rgetz@blackfin.uclinux.org> <1176112223.17975.8.camel@roc-desktop> <9561.1176209728@redhat.com> <200704101952.05380.rgetz@blackfin.uclinux.org> <6d6a94c50704170336l62fc9ael1e58197e6c3853ba@mail.gmail.com> <2817.1176910411@redhat.com> Cc: "Robin Getz" , uaca@alumni.uv.es, bryan.wu@analog.com, "Alan Cox" , waltje@uwalt.nl.mugnet.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, "Andrew Morton" , "Linux Kernel" To: "Aubrey Li" Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:53192 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161479AbXDSJno (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Apr 2007 05:43:44 -0400 In-Reply-To: <6d6a94c50704181759w12eee19agcb56058b8261dded@mail.gmail.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Aubrey Li wrote: > Yes, it's reasonable for me, as long as your > host IP is 192.168.2.128 > and > target IP is 192.168.2.141 That is correct, yes:-) I expect it's an NFS packet as my board is using an NFS root at the moment. David