From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B04923BB for ; Wed, 31 Jul 2024 07:52:46 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1722412368; cv=none; b=S1cnzefKilABtjB6p7P9RoXqicngGYlkCT+JWgORcRkaRZphuW1HlLIZKBBH9vKALgm7pizdCowkNN6Mi6xypyuPUcd76ZRySJUPF/U5AqBH3fCB5v0ChS2gTTSfke+L10EdT2m0hLZCvy2FpOvDlctEKihvNOLncs6UH+wZv5w= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1722412368; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ONnh5M5S0DlFDhcKvXNYHxA3YvsCrvwQ+s3zqVwpGg4=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:From:To:Cc:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=KYAp4xF0UHwipesTuJBrTlKX4APnfh8igo2JDSe1hj5X45FZtu3R5edbOkZPgyJtlFwqAb2+YzZiSb6hlhcnp38iTvg4e7wDZPvi+yICsz3DSrrVefMlvAhgD7bznmcJUCIRNjHIB3FoTlDYqv7M15iCIaxyrGJK7oT5QJSt8g4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=ZYK5ug9a; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="ZYK5ug9a" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1722412365; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=zxcEL5fBlhm4jOeAsHs8xDqWAgTzea7TRTpZX+8zVvc=; b=ZYK5ug9ajXCxzMgobvUeptAKyKWF8YY+4pxhDBr5U2cJq/zPK/nx+1O/30AFuSD+Szxi1J MFtNWvJZJs0wPrL6ETqc08yadEHF6Q60ir3WT7afbnCJ8aCRW8pmu0RV19EtIdgFx990Ew JgdwEkra7mnbJAOwrbktI53k8wEAzyQ= Received: from mail-lj1-f199.google.com (mail-lj1-f199.google.com [209.85.208.199]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-625-X6Lo6BauMmmC0LBEnue13g-1; Wed, 31 Jul 2024 03:52:44 -0400 X-MC-Unique: X6Lo6BauMmmC0LBEnue13g-1 Received: by mail-lj1-f199.google.com with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-2f01b609ac9so10513761fa.1 for ; Wed, 31 Jul 2024 00:52:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1722412362; x=1723017162; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:content-language:references :cc:to:from:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=zxcEL5fBlhm4jOeAsHs8xDqWAgTzea7TRTpZX+8zVvc=; b=GsvijA6SwTusNZ1nILXNy1+fAKbpJ50nWksOoU+pUdD54WRmucBH3UpBoleSrYjaal UFgYYzgubmoV1t5P4nNoBigt1Qt3B1dZc5GC7JoWIQq0ydiMS2G7NnJbEzog8Ps0QTyu aQSXjkZYgQRv0K5N2Vs+cxUFWoK3l4iB91DWORdNNN+YOIlNEFFYzPzxEnnVyTsLL2Zx qd8dQL2bt2x3BXeGBbJsXqjaq3ARzrAfXihVrQQvjRDJnc+B85bsrDbmWmpiqCrhpDXT gGtwWEgkInLcpu3GOVIxjrWMOASK81P/3aM1xoiGN/nGlaS4tfie+utiXD3evfD02IOb rbog== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yzzd2onreeqXyeGJOg346yQuq5W3POw5kPFvn/A6zcGTEh3rjGW wSP1ED+/VJrcmA7X7/wQSgeQGvWY+VFrQd8BNCmlUpRi6gVi0PMTtQ6WPJfaFByhgg2oQjDL5Sc vLPAEKJeUJq3V86lJPIusdW1w0tjVoCV27HJqsL4laUpvPaJMD37Hx8oFikDIsVulp9SVEUuTsi qS4rePvC1ll2ukELnfKloCykx22Go8+JUmbsVlSw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:108f:b0:52f:cf27:69f3 with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-52fd526bd4dmr7417701e87.2.1722412361669; Wed, 31 Jul 2024 00:52:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGzLAg0vPHQBqzxVUptDziKByQHBMO3v/6QhxdKwO3FH1/s7y3UNkNoDZht3ymk44+PjfEaVA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:108f:b0:52f:cf27:69f3 with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-52fd526bd4dmr7417684e87.2.1722412361137; Wed, 31 Jul 2024 00:52:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPV6:2a0d:3344:1712:4410::f71? ([2a0d:3344:1712:4410::f71]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 5b1f17b1804b1-4282baccccfsm11493425e9.29.2024.07.31.00.52.39 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 31 Jul 2024 00:52:40 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <29a85a62-439c-4716-abd8-a9dd8ed9e60c@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2024 09:52:38 +0200 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 08/12] testing: net-drv: add basic shaper test From: Paolo Abeni To: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: Jakub Kicinski , Jiri Pirko , Madhu Chittim , Sridhar Samudrala , Simon Horman , John Fastabend , Sunil Kovvuri Goutham , Jamal Hadi Salim References: <75fbd18f79badee2ba4303e48ce0e7922e5421d1.1722357745.git.pabeni@redhat.com> Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <75fbd18f79badee2ba4303e48ce0e7922e5421d1.1722357745.git.pabeni@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 7/30/24 22:39, Paolo Abeni wrote: > Leverage a basic/dummy netdevsim implementation to do functional > coverage for NL interface. > > Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni FTR, it looks like the CI build went wild around this patch, but the failures look unrelated to the actual changes here. i.e.: https://netdev.bots.linux.dev/static/nipa/875223/13747883/build_clang/stderr Per-file breakdown --- /tmp/tmp.z9wI8zevoA 2024-07-30 18:26:37.281153512 -0700 +++ /tmp/tmp.pwD35f06q6 2024-07-30 18:26:37.285153598 -0700 @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ + 4 ../drivers/block/drbd/drbd_bitmap.c + 4 ../drivers/block/drbd/drbd_main.c + 2 ../drivers/firmware/broadcom/bcm47xx_sprom.c + 6 ../drivers/most/most_usb.c + 1 ../drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ptp.c + 1 ../drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/siena/ptp.c + 7 ../include/linux/fortify-string.h + 2 ../include/linux/kern_levels.h + 2 ../include/linux/printk.h + 2 ../kernel/audit.c + 1 ../lib/vsprintf.c + 3 ../net/ipv4/tcp_lp.c + 2 ../security/apparmor/lsm.c Still we hit a similar issue on the previous iteration, so perhaps there is some correlation I don't see?!?