From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Schaffrath Subject: Re: tcp bw in 2.6 Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 14:40:25 +0200 Message-ID: <2CA039DF-4BE6-453F-AB61-C3D206E6D573@mac.com> References: <20071002005917.GB5480@bitmover.com> <20071002150935.GC17418@bitmover.com> <20071002154137.GD17418@bitmover.com> <20071002162534.GG17418@bitmover.com> <20071002094726.154fc619@freepuppy.rosehill> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Larry McVoy , Herbert Xu , torvalds@linux-foundation.org, davem@davemloft.net, wscott@bitmover.com, Linux NetDev To: Stephen Hemminger Return-path: Received: from smtpoutm.mac.com ([17.148.16.70]:50042 "EHLO smtpoutm.mac.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755700AbXJOMs5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Oct 2007 08:48:57 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20071002094726.154fc619@freepuppy.rosehill> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On 2007/10/02 , at 18:47, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > On Tue, 2 Oct 2007 09:25:34 -0700 > lm@bitmover.com (Larry McVoy) wrote: > >>> If the server side is the source of the data, i.e, it's transfer >>> is a >>> write loop, then I get the bad behaviour. >>> ... >>> So is this a bug or intentional? >> >> For whatever it is worth, I believed that we used to get better >> performance >> from the same hardware. My guess is that it changed somewhere >> between >> 2.6.15-1-k7 and 2.6.18-5-k7. > > For the period from 2.6.15 to 2.6.18, the kernel by default enabled > TCP > Appropriate Byte Counting. This caused bad performance on > applications that > did small writes. Stephen, maybe you can provide me with some specifics here? Thanks a lot!! Daniel