From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Song Liu Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the bpf-next tree with the bpf tree Date: Wed, 2 May 2018 06:05:46 +0000 Message-ID: <2E9CBF79-3075-48FF-87D8-834DCE1E5D9D@fb.com> References: <20180502120921.654cc338@canb.auug.org.au> <0942C278-336F-4795-BE63-FAD7FBAA231B@fb.com> <20180502155014.4f5acdcb@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Daniel Borkmann , Alexei Starovoitov , Networking , "Linux-Next Mailing List" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Yonghong Song To: Stephen Rothwell Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20180502155014.4f5acdcb@canb.auug.org.au> Content-Language: en-US Content-ID: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org > On May 1, 2018, at 10:50 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrot= e: >=20 > Hi Song, >=20 > On Wed, 2 May 2018 04:40:20 +0000 Song Liu wrote: >>=20 >>> - CHECK(build_id_matches < 1, "build id match", >>> - "Didn't find expected build ID from the map\n"); >>> + if (CHECK(build_id_matches < 1, "build id match", >>> - "Didn't find expected build ID from the map")) >>> ++ "Didn't find expected build ID from the map\n")) =20 >>=20 >> ^^^ Is there a "+" at the beginning of this line?=20 >=20 > No, this is a merge resolution diff, so the ++ means that the line did > not appear in either parent commit. Hi Stephen, Thanks for the explanation!=20 Song