From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (lindbergh.monkeyblade.net [23.128.96.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80A281C08 for ; Fri, 14 Jul 2023 04:06:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ed1-x536.google.com (mail-ed1-x536.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::536]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE35E2708 for ; Thu, 13 Jul 2023 21:06:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ed1-x536.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-51f90f713b2so1826663a12.1 for ; Thu, 13 Jul 2023 21:06:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; t=1689307570; x=1691899570; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language :references:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id:from :to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=OhXtvp/zRAWBJ0SRD1//Z0vGji/AeBOfa8eITzagFso=; b=BaLeZTGAqpbaU3GKInyx/D9zF/NqlDBhjiRNppVso2A/PWEsBEYzSNLLv6yDcS006g VvaPG1nYcdaHApdojA1IJJElUDg64k3n41iAj9OBUMzuiCMsBXYf8r40Wevl0raIyjrl eVaJpsWsQdOUrcfkc/On48tfHkszV33Wtr/MLAzrjSAFzSFIeVrWNkGUF4fSDrMsgMyX Nm4ZCFp8vrDaGxLSAH15H7eMKrdmfBMt1vFUaQ0WX+yF72axfurovvpSRnjhUlsP3vXM Ovb/LRqpVMd/ZTyIz3X2Y8W1O3tcZnUUibTI71OEo5gOnhUwebEpwvcPyte/ztqjqDvj 3Cxw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1689307570; x=1691899570; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language :references:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=OhXtvp/zRAWBJ0SRD1//Z0vGji/AeBOfa8eITzagFso=; b=j7+27wAQPknKNfOxa8eV6EyhMccAFa2duzGpm/NUIlvelUIcCgtM1C0woa8hqqACne 9HyTz8PJiZ9LaaUA4bgFjeQ7Vu0QzcGHbUba5VkNjv/VU+S8zkLXIbw7p52wwJEdJCcE 4sQAletuA/ZgIvvD36rwVuDxQAj38SzWewR6Ypnmf9JKFZ+lxgnxMXOlqcXpIojPduSV KdxWIvL8YPG48EgAYcIaLCERZNJDywNUjFD4MV1I0wB7tAXkFeVCz2dbiBrNXQ+uUPBO E9KOQvjkXqYNGoaxPoeXnFTVmwJH4n/XRFhievYNBHmWQ0AzaxoltWkYMfLo0K+ZxBMF A6Jw== X-Gm-Message-State: ABy/qLa1H/nKgW4fGvrKj0i6oKvrnpJWpll+83QI373rWVuPZvH3WNsS jkgicw868DEfGn79H+L/IqcohA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APBJJlGthjsylu+XhmKtFdqslsAhtLju7rg1Nv7E+9U6jVt7QgHJy5U+NAoOVj+RHfmpZTL1Xjls7Q== X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:2bd0:b0:993:e695:b589 with SMTP id gv16-20020a1709072bd000b00993e695b589mr3161326ejc.20.1689307570243; Thu, 13 Jul 2023 21:06:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.20] ([178.197.223.104]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i22-20020a1709063c5600b009875a6d28b0sm4872351ejg.51.2023.07.13.21.06.08 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 13 Jul 2023 21:06:09 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <2b105135-883c-4c7b-5f18-2d6e959c3655@linaro.org> Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2023 06:06:07 +0200 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.13.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] dt-bindings: net: davicom,dm9000: convert to DT schema To: Rob Herring , Conor Dooley , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Paul Cercueil , Marek Vasut , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org References: <20230713152848.82752-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> Content-Language: en-US From: Krzysztof Kozlowski In-Reply-To: <20230713152848.82752-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net On 13/07/2023 17:28, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > Hi, > > Memory controller bindings have to be updated before we can convert > davicom,dm9000 to DT schema. > > Please take it via net-next. But as usually I forgot to add "net-next" in patch subject. I really remembered about it till last moment... maybe I will just take it via memory-controllers in such case. Best regards, Krzysztof