From: "Nambiar, Amritha" <amritha.nambiar@intel.com>
To: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: Network Development <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com>,
"Samudrala, Sridhar" <sridhar.samudrala@intel.com>,
Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@gmail.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org>,
Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH v4 5/7] net: Enable Tx queue selection based on Rx queues
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2018 17:48:55 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2b43b6c9-502d-eabd-cbca-5a8e8b41e5f6@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAF=yD-Kd4DkC6DWydwiwEZytE9NsnOYZg2KFFxQ8xgAA=DUiXw@mail.gmail.com>
On 6/27/2018 3:47 AM, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
>>>> +static int get_xps_queue(struct net_device *dev, struct sk_buff *skb)
>>>> {
>>>> #ifdef CONFIG_XPS
>>>> struct xps_dev_maps *dev_maps;
>>>> - struct xps_map *map;
>>>> + struct sock *sk = skb->sk;
>>>> int queue_index = -1;
>>>>
>>>> if (!static_key_false(&xps_needed))
>>>> return -1;
>>>>
>>>> rcu_read_lock();
>>>> - dev_maps = rcu_dereference(dev->xps_cpus_map);
>>>> + if (!static_key_false(&xps_rxqs_needed))
>>>> + goto get_cpus_map;
>>>> +
>>>> + dev_maps = rcu_dereference(dev->xps_rxqs_map);
>>>> if (dev_maps) {
>>>> - unsigned int tci = skb->sender_cpu - 1;
>>>> + int tci = sk_rx_queue_get(sk);
>>>
>>> What if the rx device differs from the tx device?
>>>
>> I think I have 3 options here:
>> 1. Cache the ifindex in sock_common which will introduce a new
>> additional field in sock_common.
>> 2. Use dev_get_by_napi_id to get the device id. This could be expensive,
>> if the rxqs_map is set, this will be done on every packet and involves
>> walking through the hashlist for napi_id lookup.
>
> The tx queue mapping is cached in the sk for connected sockets, but
> indeed this would be expensive for many workloads.
>
>> 3. Remove validating device id, similar to how it is in skb_tx_hash
>> where rx_queue recorded is used and if not, fall through to flow hash
>> calculation.
>> What do you think is suitable here?
>
> Alternatively, just accept the misprediction in this rare case. But do
> make the caveat explicit in the documentation.
>
Okay, I will add this in the documentation.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-28 0:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-25 18:04 [net-next PATCH v4 0/7] Symmetric queue selection using XPS for Rx queues Amritha Nambiar
2018-06-25 18:04 ` [net-next PATCH v4 1/7] net: Refactor XPS for CPUs and " Amritha Nambiar
2018-06-26 22:53 ` Tom Herbert
2018-06-28 0:47 ` Nambiar, Amritha
2018-06-25 18:04 ` [net-next PATCH v4 2/7] net: Use static_key for XPS maps Amritha Nambiar
2018-06-26 22:54 ` Tom Herbert
2018-06-25 18:04 ` [net-next PATCH v4 3/7] net: sock: Change tx_queue_mapping in sock_common to unsigned short Amritha Nambiar
[not found] ` <CALx6S37uFs1shuPmno+L=p_Hyy1Q2qNaK+AqYvrk4HXTApL_Vg@mail.gmail.com>
2018-06-26 3:25 ` Alexander Duyck
2018-06-26 23:54 ` Nambiar, Amritha
2018-06-26 10:58 ` Willem de Bruijn
2018-06-27 0:00 ` Nambiar, Amritha
2018-06-25 18:04 ` [net-next PATCH v4 4/7] net: Record receive queue number for a connection Amritha Nambiar
2018-06-25 18:04 ` [net-next PATCH v4 5/7] net: Enable Tx queue selection based on Rx queues Amritha Nambiar
2018-06-26 2:04 ` kbuild test robot
2018-06-26 11:04 ` Willem de Bruijn
2018-06-27 0:36 ` Nambiar, Amritha
2018-06-27 10:47 ` Willem de Bruijn
2018-06-28 0:48 ` Nambiar, Amritha [this message]
2018-06-25 18:04 ` [net-next PATCH v4 6/7] net-sysfs: Add interface for Rx queue(s) map per Tx queue Amritha Nambiar
2018-06-26 10:55 ` Willem de Bruijn
2018-06-27 0:21 ` Nambiar, Amritha
2018-06-25 18:04 ` [net-next PATCH v4 7/7] Documentation: Add explanation for XPS using Rx-queue(s) map Amritha Nambiar
2018-06-26 22:59 ` Tom Herbert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2b43b6c9-502d-eabd-cbca-5a8e8b41e5f6@intel.com \
--to=amritha.nambiar@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.duyck@gmail.com \
--cc=alexander.h.duyck@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hannes@stressinduktion.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sridhar.samudrala@intel.com \
--cc=tom@herbertland.com \
--cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox