From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Ray Lee" Subject: Regression: Wireshark sees no packets in 2.6.24-rc3 Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 17:46:24 -0800 Message-ID: <2c0942db0712131746s7da91f2bkf45b3e1ddf16d1f3@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: netdev@vger.kernel.org, LKML Return-path: Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.186]:44696 "EHLO nf-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752311AbXLNBq0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Dec 2007 20:46:26 -0500 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id g13so754368nfb.21 for ; Thu, 13 Dec 2007 17:46:24 -0800 (PST) Content-Disposition: inline Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: tshark -i eth0, eth1, lo are all empty. Works under 2.6.23.0 just fine. A quick scan of the log between 2.6.24-rc3 and current tip (-rc5) doesn't show any obvious fixes, but then again, what do I know. I'll check current tip on the weekend when I'll have the luxury to have my main system down long enough for a test. Right now I'm kinda up against a deadline, but didn't want to leave it unreported. Should be easy for someone else to confirm or deny whether current tip has the problem. Ray