From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Ray Lee" Subject: Re: tbench regression on each kernel release from 2.6.22 -> 2.6.28 Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 07:31:05 -0700 Message-ID: <2c0942db0808180731k7423df7ct75e3a27d404764d0@mail.gmail.com> References: <48A086B6.2000901@linux-foundation.org> <20080811.141501.01468546.davem@davemloft.net> <1219025114.25933.6.camel@ymzhang> <48A98228.9090006@linux-foundation.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Zhang, Yanmin" , "=?UTF-8?Q?Ilpo_J=C3=A4rvinen?=" , "David Miller" , Netdev , LKML To: "Christoph Lameter" Return-path: Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com ([209.85.198.234]:3324 "EHLO rv-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753070AbYHRObG (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Aug 2008 10:31:06 -0400 Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id k40so2008037rvb.1 for ; Mon, 18 Aug 2008 07:31:05 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <48A98228.9090006@linux-foundation.org> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 7:07 AM, Christoph Lameter wrote: > Zhang, Yanmin wrote: > >> Other regressions on other machines are similar. > > There are AIM7 regressions that are similar to tbench. > > 2.6.22 28436 > 2.6.26 23064 Just a shot in the dark -- is this with Group Scheduling on or off? Off is prefered for benchmarks.