From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 05/12] ptr_ring: disallow lockless __ptr_ring_full
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2018 11:36:09 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2c1b1348-08b3-a8b3-5d59-37db6257cda9@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180126044421-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
On 2018年01月26日 10:46, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> On 2018年01月26日 07:36, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>> Similar to bcecb4bbf88a ("net: ptr_ring: otherwise safe empty checks can
>>> overrun array bounds") a lockless use of __ptr_ring_full might
>>> cause an out of bounds access.
>>>
>>> We can fix this, but it's easier to just disallow lockless
>>> __ptr_ring_full for now.
>> It looks to me that just fix this is better than disallow through doc (which
>> is easily to be ignored ...).
>>
>> Thanks
> lockless is tricky, and I'd rather not sprinkle READ/WRITE_ONCE where
> they aren't necessary.
>
The problem is then API looks a little bit strange. Lockless were only
allowed to be done at __ptr_ring_empty() but not __ptr_ring_full().
Thanks
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-29 3:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-25 23:36 [PATCH net-next 00/12] ptr_ring fixes Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-01-25 23:36 ` [PATCH net-next 01/12] ptr_ring: keep consumer_head valid at all times Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-01-26 0:11 ` John Fastabend
2018-01-25 23:36 ` [PATCH net-next 02/12] ptr_ring: clean up documentation Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-01-25 23:36 ` [PATCH net-next 03/12] ptr_ring: READ/WRITE_ONCE for __ptr_ring_empty Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-01-26 2:37 ` Jason Wang
2018-01-26 2:44 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-01-26 3:19 ` Jason Wang
2018-01-26 13:44 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-01-25 23:36 ` [PATCH net-next 04/12] tap: fix use-after-free Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-01-25 23:36 ` [PATCH net-next 05/12] ptr_ring: disallow lockless __ptr_ring_full Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-01-26 2:38 ` Jason Wang
2018-01-26 2:46 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-01-29 3:36 ` Jason Wang [this message]
2018-01-29 4:41 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-01-29 7:09 ` Jason Wang
2018-01-25 23:36 ` [PATCH net-next 06/12] Revert "net: ptr_ring: otherwise safe empty checks can overrun array bounds" Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-01-26 0:12 ` John Fastabend
2018-01-25 23:36 ` [PATCH net-next 07/12] skb_array: use __ptr_ring_empty Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-01-25 23:36 ` [PATCH net-next 08/12] ptr_ring: prevent queue load/store tearing Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-01-26 2:38 ` Jason Wang
2018-01-26 2:49 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-01-25 23:36 ` [PATCH net-next 09/12] tools/virtio: switch to __ptr_ring_empty Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-01-25 23:36 ` [PATCH net-next 10/12] tools/virtio: more stubs to fix tools build Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-01-25 23:36 ` [PATCH net-next 11/12] tools/virtio: copy READ/WRITE_ONCE Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-01-25 23:36 ` [PATCH net-next 12/12] tools/virtio: fix smp_mb on x86 Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-01-26 3:56 ` Jason Wang
2018-01-26 13:45 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2018-01-26 3:20 ` [PATCH net-next 00/12] ptr_ring fixes Jason Wang
2018-01-29 7:10 ` Jason Wang
2018-01-29 17:03 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2c1b1348-08b3-a8b3-5d59-37db6257cda9@redhat.com \
--to=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).