From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Laight Subject: RE: [PATCHv2 net-next 04/12] sctp: implement make_datafrag for sctp_stream_interleave Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2017 14:06:04 +0000 Message-ID: <2ca21c61e82a44daa29226eac54a4950@AcuMS.aculab.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Cc: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner , Neil Horman , "davem@davemloft.net" To: 'Xin Long' , network dev , "linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org" Return-path: Received: from smtp-out4.electric.net ([192.162.216.184]:62049 "EHLO smtp-out4.electric.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753410AbdLHOFy (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Dec 2017 09:05:54 -0500 In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Xin Long > Sent: 08 December 2017 13:04 ... > @@ -264,8 +264,8 @@ struct sctp_datamsg *sctp_datamsg_from_user(struct sctp_association *asoc, > frag |= SCTP_DATA_SACK_IMM; > } > > - chunk = sctp_make_datafrag_empty(asoc, sinfo, len, frag, > - 0, GFP_KERNEL); > + chunk = asoc->stream.si->make_datafrag(asoc, sinfo, len, frag, > + GFP_KERNEL); I know that none of the sctp code is very optimised, but that indirect call is going to be horrid. David