From: Matthieu Baerts <matttbe@kernel.org>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
MPTCP Upstream <mptcp@lists.linux.dev>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Mat Martineau <martineau@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [TEST] The no-kvm CI instances going away
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2024 10:44:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2d0eb4ef-dd07-4800-8fcf-637a924570fa@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240206174407.36ca59c4@kernel.org>
Hi Jakub,
On 07/02/2024 02:44, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Feb 2024 12:16:43 +0100 Matthieu Baerts wrote:
>> Hi Jakub,
>>
>> On 06/02/2024 02:41, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>>> because cloud computing is expensive I'm shutting down the instances
>>> which were running without KVM support. We're left with the KVM-enabled
>>> instances only (metal) - one normal and one with debug configs enabled.
>>
>> Thank you for the notification!
>>
>> It sounds like good news if the non-support of KVM was causing issues :)
>>
>> I think we can then no longer ignore the two MPTCP tests that were
>> unstable in the previous environment.
>>
>> The results from the different tests running on the -dbg instances don't
>> look good. Maybe some debug kconfig have a too big impact? [1]
>
> Sorry, I'm behind on the reading the list. FWIW if you want to reach me
> quickly make sure the To: doesn't include anyone else. That gets sorted
> to a higher prio folder :S
Sorry, there was no urgency, I only wanted to add a link to the previous
discussion for those who wanted more details about that.
Thank you for the note!
>> For MPTCP, one test always hits the selftest timeout [2] when using a
>> debug kconfig. I don't know what to do in this case: if we need to set a
>> timeout value that is supported by debug environments, the value will be
>> so high, it will no longer catch issues "early enough" in "normal"
>> environments.
>> Or could it be possible to ignore or double the timeout value in this
>> debug environment?
>>
>> Also, what is the plan with this debug env? It looks like the results
>> are not reported to patchwork for the moment. Maybe only "important"
>> issues, like kernel warnings, could be reported? Failed tests could be
>> reported as "Warning" instead of "Fail"?
>
> Unfortunately I'm really behind on my "real job". I don't have a clear
> plan. I think we should scale the timeout by 2x or so, but I haven't
> looked how to do that.
No hurry, I understand.
It is not clear to me how the patches you add on top of the ones from
patchwork are managed. Then, I don't know if it can help, but on the
debug instance, this command could be launched before starting the tests
to double the timeout values in all the "net" selftests:
$ find tools/testing/selftests/net -name settings -print0 | xargs -0 \
awk -i inplace -F '=' \
'{if ($1 == "timeout") { print $1 "=" $2*2 } else { print }}'
> I wish the selftest subsystem had some basic guidance.
Me too :)
Cheers,
Matt
--
Sponsored by the NGI0 Core fund.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-07 9:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-06 1:41 [TEST] The no-kvm CI instances going away Jakub Kicinski
2024-02-06 11:16 ` Matthieu Baerts
2024-02-07 1:44 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-02-07 9:44 ` Matthieu Baerts [this message]
2024-02-07 14:25 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-02-07 14:37 ` Matthieu Baerts
2024-02-07 15:29 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-02-07 16:06 ` Matthieu Baerts
2024-02-07 17:45 ` David Ahern
2024-02-07 18:55 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-02-07 19:45 ` David Ahern
2024-02-07 20:07 ` Jakub Kicinski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2d0eb4ef-dd07-4800-8fcf-637a924570fa@kernel.org \
--to=matttbe@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=martineau@kernel.org \
--cc=mptcp@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).