netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthieu Baerts <matttbe@kernel.org>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	MPTCP Upstream <mptcp@lists.linux.dev>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Mat Martineau <martineau@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [TEST] The no-kvm CI instances going away
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2024 10:44:14 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2d0eb4ef-dd07-4800-8fcf-637a924570fa@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240206174407.36ca59c4@kernel.org>

Hi Jakub,

On 07/02/2024 02:44, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Feb 2024 12:16:43 +0100 Matthieu Baerts wrote:
>> Hi Jakub,
>>
>> On 06/02/2024 02:41, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>>> because cloud computing is expensive I'm shutting down the instances
>>> which were running without KVM support. We're left with the KVM-enabled
>>> instances only (metal) - one normal and one with debug configs enabled.  
>>
>> Thank you for the notification!
>>
>> It sounds like good news if the non-support of KVM was causing issues :)
>>
>> I think we can then no longer ignore the two MPTCP tests that were
>> unstable in the previous environment.
>>
>> The results from the different tests running on the -dbg instances don't
>> look good. Maybe some debug kconfig have a too big impact? [1]
> 
> Sorry, I'm behind on the reading the list. FWIW if you want to reach me
> quickly make sure the To: doesn't include anyone else. That gets sorted
> to a higher prio folder :S

Sorry, there was no urgency, I only wanted to add a link to the previous
discussion for those who wanted more details about that.

Thank you for the note!

>> For MPTCP, one test always hits the selftest timeout [2] when using a
>> debug kconfig. I don't know what to do in this case: if we need to set a
>> timeout value that is supported by debug environments, the value will be
>> so high, it will no longer catch issues "early enough" in "normal"
>> environments.
>> Or could it be possible to ignore or double the timeout value in this
>> debug environment?
>>
>> Also, what is the plan with this debug env? It looks like the results
>> are not reported to patchwork for the moment. Maybe only "important"
>> issues, like kernel warnings, could be reported? Failed tests could be
>> reported as "Warning" instead of "Fail"?
> 
> Unfortunately I'm really behind on my "real job". I don't have a clear
> plan. I think we should scale the timeout by 2x or so, but I haven't
> looked how to do that.

No hurry, I understand.

It is not clear to me how the patches you add on top of the ones from
patchwork are managed. Then, I don't know if it can help, but on the
debug instance, this command could be launched before starting the tests
to double the timeout values in all the "net" selftests:

  $ find tools/testing/selftests/net -name settings -print0 | xargs -0 \
       awk -i inplace -F '=' \
           '{if ($1 == "timeout") { print $1 "=" $2*2 } else { print }}'

> I wish the selftest subsystem had some basic guidance.

Me too :)

Cheers,
Matt
-- 
Sponsored by the NGI0 Core fund.

  reply	other threads:[~2024-02-07  9:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-06  1:41 [TEST] The no-kvm CI instances going away Jakub Kicinski
2024-02-06 11:16 ` Matthieu Baerts
2024-02-07  1:44   ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-02-07  9:44     ` Matthieu Baerts [this message]
2024-02-07 14:25       ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-02-07 14:37         ` Matthieu Baerts
2024-02-07 15:29           ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-02-07 16:06             ` Matthieu Baerts
2024-02-07 17:45 ` David Ahern
2024-02-07 18:55   ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-02-07 19:45     ` David Ahern
2024-02-07 20:07       ` Jakub Kicinski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2d0eb4ef-dd07-4800-8fcf-637a924570fa@kernel.org \
    --to=matttbe@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=martineau@kernel.org \
    --cc=mptcp@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).