From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
To: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@queasysnail.net>, Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@gmail.com>
Cc: syzbot ci <syzbot+ci098fa7c1795eceac@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>,
andrew@lunn.ch, bridge@lists.linux.dev, davem@davemloft.net,
edumazet@google.com, horms@kernel.org, idosch@nvidia.com,
jiri@resnulli.us, jv@jvosburgh.net, kuba@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
razor@blackwall.org, sridhar.samudrala@intel.com,
syzbot@lists.linux.dev, syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [syzbot ci] Re: net: move netdev_compute_master_upper_features to ndo_set_features
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2026 17:47:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2d1e0acc-efad-4166-b738-721d88d533ca@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <abLivB2KPK0JcTFR@krikkit>
On 3/12/26 4:58 PM, Sabrina Dubroca wrote:
> 2026-03-12, 14:34:44 +0000, Hangbin Liu wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 12, 2026 at 12:13:52PM +0100, Sabrina Dubroca wrote:
>>> Proper fix (so that the notification we're sending during
>>> upper_dev_link has full linkinfo) would be to move
>>> netdev_upper_dev_link() to after macsec_changelink_common() and fix up
>>> the error handling. I don't see anything in macsec_add_dev or
>>> macsec_changelink_common that needs the device to be linked. But
>>
>> If we move the netdev_upper_dev_link() after macsec_changelink_common(),
>> we will not goto nla_put_failure via default, right?
>
> Yes.
>
>>> anyway it doesn't make sense for macsec_fill_info to return -EMSGSIZE
>>> on invalid data, so the "bandaid" should be included as well.
>>>
>>> Should this be part of this series (either just the "bandaid" or the
>>> "proper fix"+bandaid), since we never saw a problem before?
>>
>> Since macsec need the "bandaid" fix either way. How about you post the
>> "bandaid" fix to net. And I include the "proper fix" in this series for
>> net-next?
>
> But I don't think it's needed in net. Am I missing a codepath (before
> your series) where macsec_fill_info could be called for the new device
> before macsec_newlink returns? If not, it doesn't really qualify as a
> fix, that's why I was asking Paolo.
FWIW, I don't see a codepath calling into rtmsg_ifinfo_build_skb()
before device initialization, so I would be fine targeting net-next with
the EMSGSIZE-related change.
Side note, it looks like that the WARN() in the rnnetlink code here
helped identifying a real problem and correctly returning 0 when the
key_len is not yet initialized will silence it forever, what about
preserving a warning for this kind of race? something alike:
---
diff --git a/drivers/net/macsec.c b/drivers/net/macsec.c
index f6cad0746a02..82974d4fa3f6 100644
--- a/drivers/net/macsec.c
+++ b/drivers/net/macsec.c
@@ -4337,7 +4337,8 @@ static int macsec_fill_info(struct sk_buff *skb,
csid = secy->xpn ? MACSEC_CIPHER_ID_GCM_AES_XPN_256 :
MACSEC_CIPHER_ID_GCM_AES_256;
break;
default:
- goto nla_put_failure;
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
+ return 0;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-12 16:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-10 7:45 [PATCH net-next 0/3] net: move netdev_compute_master_upper_features to ndo_set_features Hangbin Liu
2026-03-10 7:45 ` [PATCH net-next 1/3] net: use ndo_set_features to set offload features for bonding/bridge/team Hangbin Liu
2026-03-10 7:45 ` [PATCH net-next 2/3] failover: use ndo_set_features for failover offload compute Hangbin Liu
2026-03-10 7:45 ` [PATCH net-next 3/3] net: no need to disable LRO specifically Hangbin Liu
2026-03-10 17:02 ` [syzbot ci] Re: net: move netdev_compute_master_upper_features to ndo_set_features syzbot ci
2026-03-10 19:17 ` Sabrina Dubroca
2026-03-11 0:47 ` Hangbin Liu
2026-03-11 21:18 ` Sabrina Dubroca
2026-03-12 9:40 ` Paolo Abeni
2026-03-12 11:13 ` Sabrina Dubroca
2026-03-12 14:34 ` Hangbin Liu
2026-03-12 15:58 ` Sabrina Dubroca
2026-03-12 16:47 ` Paolo Abeni [this message]
2026-03-12 17:07 ` Sabrina Dubroca
2026-03-12 9:46 ` [PATCH net-next 0/3] " Paolo Abeni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2d1e0acc-efad-4166-b738-721d88d533ca@redhat.com \
--to=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=bridge@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=idosch@nvidia.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=jv@jvosburgh.net \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liuhangbin@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=razor@blackwall.org \
--cc=sd@queasysnail.net \
--cc=sridhar.samudrala@intel.com \
--cc=syzbot+ci098fa7c1795eceac@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=syzbot@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox