From: Alexandra Winter <wintera@linux.ibm.com>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Thorsten Winkler <twinkler@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] net/iucv: clean up iucv kernel-doc warnings
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2026 16:35:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2ddf6abd-d10c-4d75-8f84-0fd1ccb5435c@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260201072309.222155-1-rdunlap@infradead.org>
On 01.02.26 08:23, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> Fix numerous (many) kernel-doc warnings in iucv.[ch]:
>
> - remove kernel-doc on static functions in iucv.c
> - convert function documentation comments to a common (kernel-doc) look,
> even for static functions (without "/**")
> - use matching parameter and parameter description names
>
> Examples:
>
> Warning: include/net/iucv/iucv.h:210 missing initial short description
> on line: * iucv_unregister
> Warning: include/net/iucv/iucv.h:216 function parameter 'handle' not
> described in 'iucv_unregister'
> Warning: include/net/iucv/iucv.h:467 function parameter 'answer' not
> described in 'iucv_message_send2way'
> Warning: net/iucv/iucv.c:727 missing initial short description on line:
> * iucv_cleanup_queue
>
> Build-tested with both "make htmldocs" and "make ARCH=s390 defconfig all".
>
> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
> ---
Thank you very much for your effort Randy.
FYI: I had to use 'scripts/kernel-doc.py -none -Wall include/net/iucv/*' to see the warnings.
> v2:
> - correct verbs in descriptions of 2 functions (Jakub)
> - removed duplicate kernel-doc comments from the header file (Jakub)
>
> Cc: Alexandra Winter <wintera@linux.ibm.com>
> Cc: Thorsten Winkler <twinkler@linux.ibm.com>
> Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
> Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
> Cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
> Cc: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
>
> include/net/iucv/iucv.h | 209 ------------------------------
> net/iucv/iucv.c | 259 ++++++++++++++++++--------------------
> 2 files changed, 128 insertions(+), 340 deletions(-)
>
> --- linux-next-20260130.orig/include/net/iucv/iucv.h
> +++ linux-next-20260130/include/net/iucv/iucv.h
> @@ -70,7 +70,7 @@
> #define IUCV_IPLOCAL 0x01
>
> /*
> - * iucv_array : Defines buffer array.
> + * iucv_array - Defines buffer array.
Did that create a kernel doc warning? It's a struct, not a function.
I propose
+ * struct iucv_array
like other structs in this file.
[...]
> @@ -757,13 +742,12 @@ static void iucv_cleanup_queue(void)
> }
>
> /**
> - * iucv_register:
> + * iucv_register - Registers a driver with IUCV.
> + *
> * @handler: address of iucv handler structure
> * @smp: != 0 indicates that the handler can deal with out of order messages
> *
> - * Registers a driver with IUCV.
> - *
> - * Returns 0 on success, -ENOMEM if the memory allocation for the pathid
> + * Returns: 0 on success, -ENOMEM if the memory allocation for the pathid
> * table failed, or -EIO if IUCV_DECLARE_BUFFER failed on all cpus.
> */
> int iucv_register(struct iucv_handler *handler, int smp)
Before this one, you changed /** to /*
after this one you left /**
That's a bit inconsistent.
All the fixes look good to me. And they get rid of the mentioned warnings.
I appreciate your approach to use the existing wording, though it may not
be according to the latest style guidelines.
Reviewed-by: Alexandra Winter <wintera@linux.ibm.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-02 15:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-01 7:23 [PATCH v2 net-next] net/iucv: clean up iucv kernel-doc warnings Randy Dunlap
2026-02-02 15:35 ` Alexandra Winter [this message]
2026-02-02 22:07 ` Randy Dunlap
2026-02-03 9:39 ` Alexandra Winter
2026-02-06 7:01 ` Randy Dunlap
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2ddf6abd-d10c-4d75-8f84-0fd1ccb5435c@linux.ibm.com \
--to=wintera@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=twinkler@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox