public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Justin Iurman <justin.iurman@gmail.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, pabeni@redhat.com, horms@kernel.org,
	dsahern@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	eric.dumazet@gmail.com, yimingqian591@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] ipv6: ioam: fix potential NULL dereferences in __ioam6_fill_trace_data()
Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2026 12:13:06 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2de5a3d1-cc8f-48c2-a590-09bef92e9adb@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260403145010.4b4e5865@kernel.org>

On 4/3/26 23:50, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Apr 2026 14:47:32 -0700 Eric Dumazet wrote:
>>> If the ingress device has more RX queues than the egress device (dev) has
>>> TX queues, skb_get_queue_mapping(skb) will exceed dev->num_tx_queues.
>>>
>>> Since skb_get_tx_queue() does not clamp the index, will it return an
>>> out-of-bounds pointer into the egress device's dev->_tx array, causing
>>> dereferencing queue->qdisc to read invalid memory?
>>
>> This seems a different bug ?
>>
>> I mean, do we need to fix all bug in a single patch ?
> 
> no no, sorry, i'm just sending this out for Justin or you as a separate
> thing.

Thanks Jakub, I don't know how I missed that. It's not just about a 
possible OOB: it's actually incorrect for IOAM to do that because we're 
relying on a lucky assumption at best (i.e., if queue_mapping on RX == 
queue_mapping on TX). This unfortunately rules out the possibility to 
have an accurate per queue visibility (which I originally provided for 
flexibility). I've had a local patch for a long time to aggregate the 
queue depth (i.e., sum of all TX queues). It is more expensive(***), but 
it would kill two birds with one stone and solve both problems 
simultaneously.

Jakub, Eric, please let me know if the following plan works for both of you:
- (net) fix the OOB reported by Jakub (and, while at it, add missing 
locks around qdisc_qstats_qlen_backlog() -> also included in my local patch)
- (net-next) after the merge window, add the new feature

After that, the per queue visibility would be considered 
legacy/deprecated and not the default behavior. Documentation would be 
updated accordingly to explain why per queue visibility cannot be trusted.

  (***) the advise to operators in such a case is (obviously) to reduce 
the IOAM insertion (with the frequency parameter), especially at line rate.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-04-04 10:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-02 10:17 [PATCH net] ipv6: ioam: fix potential NULL dereferences in __ioam6_fill_trace_data() Eric Dumazet
2026-04-02 18:10 ` Justin Iurman
2026-04-03 21:44 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-04-03 21:47   ` Eric Dumazet
2026-04-03 21:50     ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-04-03 21:51       ` Eric Dumazet
2026-04-04 10:13       ` Justin Iurman [this message]
2026-04-04 11:44         ` Eric Dumazet
2026-04-04 17:32           ` Justin Iurman
2026-04-03 22:00 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2de5a3d1-cc8f-48c2-a590-09bef92e9adb@gmail.com \
    --to=justin.iurman@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=yimingqian591@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox