From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jamal Hadi Salim Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v8 2/3] net sched actions: dump more than TCA_ACT_MAX_PRIO actions per batch Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2017 08:46:22 -0400 Message-ID: <2e09d117-60f9-97ed-9f63-c94130ddbb0c@mojatatu.com> References: <1493121247-11863-1-git-send-email-jhs@emojatatu.com> <1493121247-11863-3-git-send-email-jhs@emojatatu.com> <20170425121338.GC1867@nanopsycho.orion> <5e54edd8-3943-6f09-490f-ff04b83077f6@mojatatu.com> <20170425160445.GD1867@nanopsycho.orion> <20170426110241.GA28251@vergenet.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: davem@davemloft.net, xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com, eric.dumazet@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Simon Horman , Jiri Pirko Return-path: Received: from mail-io0-f195.google.com ([209.85.223.195]:35866 "EHLO mail-io0-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1431790AbdDZMqZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Apr 2017 08:46:25 -0400 Received: by mail-io0-f195.google.com with SMTP id x86so302570ioe.3 for ; Wed, 26 Apr 2017 05:46:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20170426110241.GA28251@vergenet.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 17-04-26 07:02 AM, Simon Horman wrote: > On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 06:04:45PM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote: [..] >> So fix iproute2. It is always first kernel, then iproute2. > > Perhaps I am missing the point or somehow misguided but I would expect that > if the UAPI uses BIT() it also provides BIT(). There is a user of BIT() already in iproute2 (devlink). We can move the code to be more generally available for other iproute2 users. Then this UAPI change makes use of it. cheers, jamal