From: Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <edumazet@google.com>,
<pabeni@redhat.com>,
"intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org"
<intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] docs: netdev: recommend against --in-reply-to
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2023 22:38:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2e5a15c4-fce3-c944-45b9-1e778ec4178e@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230823154922.1162644-1-kuba@kernel.org>
On 8/23/23 17:49, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> It's somewhat unfortunate but with (my?) the current tooling
> if people post new versions of a set in reply to an old version
> managing the review queue gets difficult. So recommend against it.
For my setup it is also annoying.
(CC IWL + BCC to our pre-IWL list.)
>
> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
> ---
> Documentation/process/maintainer-netdev.rst | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/process/maintainer-netdev.rst b/Documentation/process/maintainer-netdev.rst
> index 2ab843cde830..c1c732e9748b 100644
> --- a/Documentation/process/maintainer-netdev.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/process/maintainer-netdev.rst
> @@ -167,6 +167,8 @@ Asking the maintainer for status updates on your
> patch is a good way to ensure your patch is ignored or pushed to the
> bottom of the priority list.
>
> +.. _Changes requested:
> +
> Changes requested
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> @@ -359,6 +361,10 @@ Make sure you address all the feedback in your new posting. Do not post a new
> version of the code if the discussion about the previous version is still
> ongoing, unless directly instructed by a reviewer.
>
> +The new version of patches should be posted as a separate thread,
> +not as a reply to the previous posting. Change log should include a link
> +to the previous posting (see :ref:`Changes requested`).
> +
> Testing
> -------
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-23 20:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-23 15:49 [PATCH net-next] docs: netdev: recommend against --in-reply-to Jakub Kicinski
2023-08-23 20:38 ` Przemek Kitszel [this message]
2023-08-24 9:08 ` Martin Habets
2023-08-24 15:29 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-10-30 21:10 ` Jacob Keller
2023-08-24 18:30 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2e5a15c4-fce3-c944-45b9-1e778ec4178e@intel.com \
--to=przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).