From: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
To: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <borkmann@iogearbox.net>,
Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, gospo@broadcom.com,
bjorn.topel@intel.com, michael.chan@broadcom.com
Subject: Re: [bpf-next V1-RFC PATCH 01/14] xdp: base API for new XDP rx-queue info concept
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 06:23:40 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2effe097-6802-2020-075d-47cc3576f78f@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171218115501.3f1fcf36@redhat.com>
On 12/18/17 3:55 AM, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
>
> Handling return-errors in the drivers complicated the driver code, as it
> involves unraveling and deallocating other RX-rings etc (that were
> already allocated) if the reg fails. (Also notice next patch will allow
> dev == NULL, if right ptype is set).
>
> I'm not completely rejecting you idea, as this is a good optimization
> trick, which is to move validation checks to setup-time, thus allowing
> less validation checks at runtime. I sort-of actually already did
> this, as I allow bpf to deref dev without NULL check. I would argue
> this is good enough, as we will crash in a predictable way, as above
> WARN will point to which driver violated the API.
>
> If people think it is valuable I can change this API to return an err?
Saeed's suggested API in a comment on patch 12 also removes most of the
WARN_ONs as it sets the device and index:
xdp_rxq_info_reg(netdev, rxq_index)
{
rxqueue = dev->_rx + rxq_index;
xdp_rxq = rxqueue.xdp_rxq;
xdp_rxq_info_init(xdp_rxq);
xdp_rxq.dev = netdev;
xdp_rxq.queue_index = rxq_index;
}
xdp_rxq_info_unreg(netdev, rxq_index)
{
...
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-18 13:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-13 11:19 [bpf-next V1-RFC PATCH 00/14] xdp: new XDP rx-queue info concept Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-12-13 11:19 ` [bpf-next V1-RFC PATCH 01/14] xdp: base API for " Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-12-14 2:34 ` David Ahern
2017-12-18 10:55 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-12-18 13:23 ` David Ahern [this message]
2017-12-18 15:52 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-12-21 16:59 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-12-13 11:19 ` [bpf-next V1-RFC PATCH 02/14] xdp/mlx5: setup xdp_rxq_info and extend with qtype Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-12-13 12:27 ` Tariq Toukan
2017-12-13 13:44 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-12-13 23:03 ` Saeed Mahameed
2017-12-14 6:46 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-12-13 11:19 ` [bpf-next V1-RFC PATCH 03/14] i40e: setup xdp_rxq_info Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-12-18 10:52 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Björn Töpel
2017-12-18 13:05 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-12-13 11:19 ` [bpf-next V1-RFC PATCH 04/14] ixgbe: " Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-12-13 11:19 ` [bpf-next V1-RFC PATCH 05/14] xdp/qede: setup xdp_rxq_info and intro xdp_rxq_info_is_reg Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-12-13 11:19 ` [bpf-next V1-RFC PATCH 06/14] mlx4: setup xdp_rxq_info Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-12-13 12:42 ` Tariq Toukan
2017-12-13 14:00 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-12-13 11:19 ` [bpf-next V1-RFC PATCH 07/14] bnxt_en: " Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-12-13 11:20 ` [bpf-next V1-RFC PATCH 08/14] nfp: " Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-12-14 2:34 ` Jakub Kicinski
2017-12-18 20:25 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-12-13 11:20 ` [bpf-next V1-RFC PATCH 09/14] thunderx: " Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-12-13 11:20 ` [bpf-next V1-RFC PATCH 10/14] tun: " Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-12-20 7:48 ` Jason Wang
2017-12-21 15:42 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-12-13 11:20 ` [bpf-next V1-RFC PATCH 11/14] virtio_net: " Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-12-13 11:20 ` [bpf-next V1-RFC PATCH 12/14] xdp: generic XDP handling of xdp_rxq_info Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-12-13 22:50 ` Saeed Mahameed
2017-12-18 9:47 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-12-13 11:20 ` [bpf-next V1-RFC PATCH 13/14] bpf: finally expose xdp_rxq_info to XDP bpf-programs Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-12-13 11:20 ` [bpf-next V1-RFC PATCH 14/14] samples/bpf: program demonstrating access to xdp_rxq_info Jesper Dangaard Brouer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2effe097-6802-2020-075d-47cc3576f78f@gmail.com \
--to=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=bjorn.topel@intel.com \
--cc=borkmann@iogearbox.net \
--cc=brouer@redhat.com \
--cc=gospo@broadcom.com \
--cc=michael.chan@broadcom.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).