From: Anil Gunturu <anil.gunturu@gmail.com>
To: netdev@oss.sgi.com
Subject: kernel scalability
Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2004 23:17:01 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2f61ba570411032317438bd494@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
Hi,
We are porting linux kernel (2.4.18) for an embdded device that
supports a large number of logical interfaces (upto 200) and routes
(4000). There are only two physical ethernet interfaces, but we are
planning to add multiple ip addresses and routes using the "ip"
utility from iproute2 package. Just wondering if there are any
scalability issues in doing so as far as the kernel is concerned.
Thanks for your help,
-Anil
reply other threads:[~2004-11-04 7:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2f61ba570411032317438bd494@mail.gmail.com \
--to=anil.gunturu@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).