public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthieu Baerts <matttbe@kernel.org>
To: Li Xiasong <lixiasong1@huawei.com>,
	martineau@kernel.org, geliang@kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net,
	edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
	horms@kernel.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, mptcp@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, weiyongjun1@huawei.com,
	yuehaibing@huawei.com, zhangchangzhong@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] mptcp: fix soft lockup in mptcp_recvmsg()
Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2026 12:08:49 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2fc4d789-5ee4-4618-8cb7-06a560d8c659@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260302052651.1466983-1-lixiasong1@huawei.com>

Hi Li,

On 02/03/2026 06:26, Li Xiasong wrote:
> syzbot reported a soft lockup in mptcp_recvmsg() [0].
> 
> When receiving data with MSG_PEEK | MSG_WAITALL flags, the skb is not
> removed from the sk_receive_queue. This causes sk_wait_data() to always
> find available data and never perform actual waiting, leading to a soft
> lockup.
> 
> Fix this by adding a 'last' parameter to track the last peeked skb.
> This allows sk_wait_data() to make informed waiting decisions and prevent
> infinite loops when MSG_PEEK is used.

Thank you for the patch! I will check why sk_wait_data() was not used
with the last SKB before.

By chance, do you have a reproducer that you could eventually share please?

Cheers,
Matt
-- 
Sponsored by the NGI0 Core fund.


  reply	other threads:[~2026-03-03 11:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-02  5:26 [PATCH net] mptcp: fix soft lockup in mptcp_recvmsg() Li Xiasong
2026-03-03 11:08 ` Matthieu Baerts [this message]
2026-03-03 18:06 ` Matthieu Baerts
2026-03-04  9:24   ` Li Xiasong
2026-03-23 11:19     ` Matthieu Baerts
2026-03-04  9:07 ` Paolo Abeni
2026-03-04 11:33   ` Li Xiasong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2fc4d789-5ee4-4618-8cb7-06a560d8c659@kernel.org \
    --to=matttbe@kernel.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=geliang@kernel.org \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lixiasong1@huawei.com \
    --cc=martineau@kernel.org \
    --cc=mptcp@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=weiyongjun1@huawei.com \
    --cc=yuehaibing@huawei.com \
    --cc=zhangchangzhong@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox