From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] network driver fixes Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2016 13:56:16 +0100 Message-ID: <3029473.9UEV1vNhFu@wuerfel> References: <1453903507-3427225-1-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de> <20160128.161413.1463071323452305953.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: David Miller , netdev@vger.kernel.org To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Return-path: Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.131]:58843 "EHLO mout.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755428AbcA2M4s (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Jan 2016 07:56:48 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20160128.161413.1463071323452305953.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thursday 28 January 2016 16:14:13 David Miller wrote: > From: Arnd Bergmann > Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 15:04:50 +0100 > > > These are all fixes for relatively harmless bugs that showed up > > in my randconfig testing, so they should not be needed for v4.5 > > but get merged into net-next. > > > > I've managed to address all 'uninitialized variable' warnings that > > I get in ARM randconfig kernels now, this series includes the > > last five I got in network drivers. They are often really annoying > > warnings but when we get new ones, they often are about actual > > bugs in corner cases, so I'm trying hard to eliminate the false > > positives here to get people to pay attention to added warnings. > > I've recently tried building with an older gcc and found tons more > > that are all bogus, this series only addresses the ones that > > gcc-5.2 finds. > > Arnd I'm expecting a respin of this series to address with the > feedback you've been given. > Done. I wasn't sure if you planned to pick up the patches individually, thanks for the clarification. Arnd