From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: SF Markus Elfring Subject: Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: See if modified files are marked obsolete in MAINTAINERS Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 22:50:15 +0200 Message-ID: <30522d64-8303-cf13-d967-a5759aeb2278@users.sourceforge.net> References: <87shtwvm63.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> <7ceaa510dc9d2df05ec4b456baed7bb1415550b3.1471889575.git.joe@perches.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Andrew Morton , Kalle Valo , Arend van Spriel , Andy Whitcroft , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jouni Malinen , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Julia Lawall , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: Joe Perches Return-path: In-Reply-To: <7ceaa510dc9d2df05ec4b456baed7bb1415550b3.1471889575.git.joe@perches.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org > @@ -2289,6 +2299,10 @@ sub process { > } > > if ($found_file) { > + if (is_maintained_obsolete($realfile)) { > + WARN("OBSOLETE", > + "$realfile is marked as 'obsolete' in the MAINTAINERS hierarchy. No unnecessary modifications please.\n"); > + } How do you think about to avoid a double negation in such a warning message? Would a wording like "… Only really necessary modifications please.\n" be more useful here? Regards, Markus