From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from vulcan.natalenko.name ([104.207.131.136]:39316 "EHLO vulcan.natalenko.name" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750915AbeBTUGz (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Feb 2018 15:06:55 -0500 From: Oleksandr Natalenko To: Eric Dumazet Cc: Eric Dumazet , "David S . Miller" , netdev , Neal Cardwell , Yuchung Cheng , Soheil Hassas Yeganeh Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/6] tcp: remove non GSO code Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2018 21:06:53 +0100 Message-ID: <3082891.9sbklgPxWn@natalenko.name> In-Reply-To: References: <20180219195652.242663-1-edumazet@google.com> <9897026.Es27HaT4ta@natalenko.name> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On =FAter=FD 20. =FAnora 2018 20:56:24 CET Eric Dumazet wrote: > That is with the other patches _not_ applied ? Yes, other patches are not applied. It is v4.15.4 + this patch only + BBR += =20 fq_codel or pfifo_fast. Shall I re-test it on the net-next with the whole=20 patchset (because it is not applied cleanly to 4.15)? Oleksandr