From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
To: Hongyan Xu <getshell@seu.edu.cn>, Stephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net>
Cc: Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@oss.qualcomm.com>,
Sergey Ryazanov <ryazanov.s.a@gmail.com>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v5] net: wwan: qcom_bam_dmux: fix TX DMA channel use-after-free
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2026 12:20:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <30dc9ad2-0ff7-4d97-8b01-ab2267fb56b8@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260903180057.1437-1-getshell@seu.edu.cn>
On 9/3/26 8:00 PM, Hongyan Xu wrote:
> The modem power-control interrupt can release dmux->tx while the command,
> netdev transmit, or deferred wakeup paths are preparing and submitting
> DMA descriptors. A runtime PM reference alone does not order those paths
> against the modem-driven interrupt.
>
> The pc and pc-ack IRQ actions do not encode the modem protocol order. A
> pc=false edge raised before a new host power vote is acknowledged can
> therefore be handled after runtime resume observes the acknowledgment and
> starts using TX. On the other hand, acknowledging a new pc=false transition
> while the host vote remains active lets the modem power down the DMA engine
> underneath the driver.
>
> Serialize power-control state with a mutex. Before publishing a host-vote
> acknowledgment, sample the actual pc line and process any delayed
> transition.
> When pc goes low while the host vote is active and the TX channel is
> allocated, defer the transition without acknowledging it. Repeated pc=false
> interrupts remain deferred and cannot release the channel. If pc returns
> high, cancel the deferred transition.
>
> Runtime suspend drops the host vote under the same lock. If a pc=false
> transition was deferred, it then terminates and releases the DMA channels
> before acknowledging the transition. If runtime suspend wins the race with
> the pc interrupt, the interrupt observes the inactive host vote and can
> safely perform the same shutdown. This orders channel release after the
> last runtime PM user without relying on whether the modem acknowledges
> the host vote before or after asserting pc.
>
> Keep both state IRQs disabled until the initial probe state is committed,
> and disable both before final remove cleanup. Use a device-managed mutex
> and scoped guards for the serialized paths.
>
> This issue was found by the author's in-house static analysis tool.
> The patch was reviewed by the author.
>
> Fixes: 21a0ffd9b38c ("net: wwan: Add Qualcomm BAM-DMUX WWAN network driver")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Hongyan Xu <getshell@seu.edu.cn>
>
> ---
> Changes in v5:
> - Drop the vote-ack state; PC-down safety does not depend on ACK ordering.
> - Keep repeated PC-low interrupts deferred while TX can still be in use.
> - Complete a deferred PC-down directly from runtime suspend after dropping
> the host vote.
> - Move TX channel acquisition into a scoped helper and retain early returns.
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20260822085308.1089-1-getshell@seu.edu.cn/
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wwan/qcom_bam_dmux.c b/drivers/net/wwan/qcom_bam_dmux.c
> index cc6ace8..429d34a 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wwan/qcom_bam_dmux.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wwan/qcom_bam_dmux.c
> @@ -6,12 +6,14 @@
>
> #include <linux/atomic.h>
> #include <linux/bitops.h>
> +#include <linux/cleanup.h>
> #include <linux/completion.h>
> #include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
> #include <linux/dmaengine.h>
> #include <linux/if_arp.h>
> #include <linux/interrupt.h>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/mutex.h>
> #include <linux/netdevice.h>
> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> #include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
> @@ -64,15 +66,23 @@ struct bam_dmux_skb_dma {
> dma_addr_t addr;
> };
>
> +enum bam_dmux_pc_vote {
> + BAM_DMUX_PC_VOTE_INACTIVE, /* pc_vote = false */
> + BAM_DMUX_PC_VOTE_ACTIVE, /* pc_vote = true */
> + BAM_DMUX_PC_VOTE_DOWN_PENDING, /* pc = false while host vote active */
> +};
> +
> struct bam_dmux {
> struct device *dev;
>
> - int pc_irq;
> + int pc_irq, pc_ack_irq;
> bool pc_state, pc_ack_state;
> struct qcom_smem_state *pc, *pc_ack;
> u32 pc_mask, pc_ack_mask;
> wait_queue_head_t pc_wait;
> struct completion pc_ack_completion;
> + struct mutex power_lock; /* Protect power-control state */
> + enum bam_dmux_pc_vote pc_vote;
>
> struct dma_chan *rx, *tx;
> struct bam_dmux_skb_dma rx_skbs[BAM_DMUX_NUM_SKB];
> @@ -99,6 +109,24 @@ static void bam_dmux_pc_vote(struct bam_dmux *dmux, bool enable)
> enable ? dmux->pc_mask : 0);
> }
>
> +static void bam_dmux_pc_vote_locked(struct bam_dmux *dmux, bool enable)
> +{
> + lockdep_assert_held(&dmux->power_lock);
> +
> + if (enable)
> + dmux->pc_vote = BAM_DMUX_PC_VOTE_ACTIVE;
> + else if (dmux->pc_vote != BAM_DMUX_PC_VOTE_DOWN_PENDING)
> + dmux->pc_vote = BAM_DMUX_PC_VOTE_INACTIVE;
> + bam_dmux_pc_vote(dmux, enable);
> +}
> +
> +static void bam_dmux_pc_vote_protected(struct bam_dmux *dmux, bool enable)
> +{
> + mutex_lock(&dmux->power_lock);
> + bam_dmux_pc_vote_locked(dmux, enable);
> + mutex_unlock(&dmux->power_lock);
> +}
> +
> static void bam_dmux_pc_ack(struct bam_dmux *dmux)
> {
> qcom_smem_state_update_bits(dmux->pc_ack, dmux->pc_ack_mask,
> @@ -655,6 +683,8 @@ static void bam_dmux_free_skbs(struct bam_dmux_skb_dma skbs[],
>
> static void bam_dmux_power_off(struct bam_dmux *dmux)
> {
> + lockdep_assert_held(&dmux->power_lock);
> +
> if (dmux->tx) {
> dmaengine_terminate_sync(dmux->tx);
> dma_release_channel(dmux->tx);
> @@ -670,10 +700,24 @@ static void bam_dmux_power_off(struct bam_dmux *dmux)
> bam_dmux_free_skbs(dmux->rx_skbs, DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
> }
>
> -static irqreturn_t bam_dmux_pc_irq(int irq, void *data)
> +static void bam_dmux_complete_pc_down(struct bam_dmux *dmux)
> {
> - struct bam_dmux *dmux = data;
> - bool new_state = !dmux->pc_state;
> + lockdep_assert_held(&dmux->power_lock);
> +
> + bam_dmux_power_off(dmux);
> + bam_dmux_pc_ack(dmux);
> + WRITE_ONCE(dmux->pc_state, false);
> +}
> +
> +static bool bam_dmux_handle_pc(struct bam_dmux *dmux, bool new_state)
> +{
> + lockdep_assert_held(&dmux->power_lock);
> +
> + if (new_state == dmux->pc_state) {
> + if (new_state && dmux->pc_vote == BAM_DMUX_PC_VOTE_DOWN_PENDING)
> + dmux->pc_vote = BAM_DMUX_PC_VOTE_ACTIVE;
> + return false;
> + }
>
> dev_dbg(dmux->dev, "pc: %u\n", new_state);
>
> @@ -682,13 +726,40 @@ static irqreturn_t bam_dmux_pc_irq(int irq, void *data)
> bam_dmux_pc_ack(dmux);
> else
> bam_dmux_power_off(dmux);
> + } else if (dmux->tx && dmux->pc_vote != BAM_DMUX_PC_VOTE_INACTIVE) {
> + /* The modem must keep the DMA engine on until pc is acked. */
> + dmux->pc_vote = BAM_DMUX_PC_VOTE_DOWN_PENDING;
> + dev_err_ratelimited(dmux->dev,
> + "refusing pc down while host vote is active\n");
> + return false;
> } else {
> - bam_dmux_power_off(dmux);
> - bam_dmux_pc_ack(dmux);
> + bam_dmux_complete_pc_down(dmux);
> }
>
> - dmux->pc_state = new_state;
> - wake_up_all(&dmux->pc_wait);
> + if (new_state)
> + WRITE_ONCE(dmux->pc_state, true);
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> +static irqreturn_t bam_dmux_pc_irq(int irq, void *data)
> +{
> + struct bam_dmux *dmux = data;
> + bool new_state, wake;
> + int ret;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&dmux->power_lock);
> + ret = irq_get_irqchip_state(dmux->pc_irq, IRQCHIP_STATE_LINE_LEVEL,
> + &new_state);
> + if (ret) {
> + mutex_unlock(&dmux->power_lock);
> + dev_err_ratelimited(dmux->dev, "failed to read pc state: %d\n", ret);
> + return IRQ_HANDLED;
> + }
> +
> + wake = bam_dmux_handle_pc(dmux, new_state);
> + mutex_unlock(&dmux->power_lock);
> + if (wake)
> + wake_up_all(&dmux->pc_wait);
>
> return IRQ_HANDLED;
> }
> @@ -696,9 +767,27 @@ static irqreturn_t bam_dmux_pc_irq(int irq, void *data)
> static irqreturn_t bam_dmux_pc_ack_irq(int irq, void *data)
> {
> struct bam_dmux *dmux = data;
> + bool new_state, wake = false;
> + int ret;
>
> dev_dbg(dmux->dev, "pc ack\n");
> +
> + /* Process an earlier pc edge before publishing the host-vote ack. */
> + synchronize_irq(dmux->pc_irq);
> + mutex_lock(&dmux->power_lock);
> + ret = irq_get_irqchip_state(dmux->pc_irq, IRQCHIP_STATE_LINE_LEVEL,
> + &new_state);
> + if (ret) {
> + mutex_unlock(&dmux->power_lock);
> + dev_err_ratelimited(dmux->dev, "failed to read pc state: %d\n", ret);
> + return IRQ_HANDLED;
> + }
> +
> + wake = bam_dmux_handle_pc(dmux, new_state);
> complete_all(&dmux->pc_ack_completion);
> + mutex_unlock(&dmux->power_lock);
> + if (wake)
> + wake_up_all(&dmux->pc_wait);
>
> return IRQ_HANDLED;
> }
> @@ -706,9 +795,47 @@ static irqreturn_t bam_dmux_pc_ack_irq(int irq, void *data)
> static int bam_dmux_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
> {
> struct bam_dmux *dmux = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> + bool wake = false;
>
> dev_dbg(dev, "runtime suspend\n");
> - bam_dmux_pc_vote(dmux, false);
> +
> + scoped_guard(mutex, &dmux->power_lock) {
> + bam_dmux_pc_vote_locked(dmux, false);
> + if (dmux->pc_vote == BAM_DMUX_PC_VOTE_DOWN_PENDING) {
> + dmux->pc_vote = BAM_DMUX_PC_VOTE_INACTIVE;
> + bam_dmux_complete_pc_down(dmux);
> + wake = true;
> + } else if (!dmux->pc_state) {
> + bam_dmux_power_off(dmux);
> + }
> + }
> + if (wake)
> + wake_up_all(&dmux->pc_wait);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int bam_dmux_request_tx(struct bam_dmux *dmux)
> +{
> + struct device *dev = dmux->dev;
> +
> + scoped_guard(mutex, &dmux->power_lock) {
> + /* Ensure that we actually initialized successfully */
> + if (!dmux->rx)
> + return -ENXIO;
> +
> + /* Request TX channel if necessary */
> + if (dmux->tx)
> + return 0;
> +
> + dmux->tx = dma_request_chan(dev, "tx");
> + if (IS_ERR(dmux->tx)) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to request TX DMA channel: %pe\n",
> + dmux->tx);
> + dmux->tx = NULL;
> + return -ENXIO;
> + }
> + }
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -716,6 +843,7 @@ static int bam_dmux_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
> static int __maybe_unused bam_dmux_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
> {
> struct bam_dmux *dmux = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> + int ret;
>
> dev_dbg(dev, "runtime resume\n");
>
> @@ -724,50 +852,41 @@ static int __maybe_unused bam_dmux_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
> BAM_DMUX_REMOTE_TIMEOUT))
> return -ETIMEDOUT;
>
> + synchronize_irq(dmux->pc_irq);
> +
> /* Vote for power state */
> - bam_dmux_pc_vote(dmux, true);
> + bam_dmux_pc_vote_protected(dmux, true);
>
> /* Wait for ack */
> if (!wait_for_completion_timeout(&dmux->pc_ack_completion,
> BAM_DMUX_REMOTE_TIMEOUT)) {
> - bam_dmux_pc_vote(dmux, false);
> + bam_dmux_runtime_suspend(dev);
> return -ETIMEDOUT;
> }
>
> + synchronize_irq(dmux->pc_irq);
> +
> /* Wait until we're up */
> - if (!wait_event_timeout(dmux->pc_wait, dmux->pc_state,
> + if (!wait_event_timeout(dmux->pc_wait, READ_ONCE(dmux->pc_state),
> BAM_DMUX_REMOTE_TIMEOUT)) {
> - bam_dmux_pc_vote(dmux, false);
> + bam_dmux_runtime_suspend(dev);
> return -ETIMEDOUT;
> }
>
> - /* Ensure that we actually initialized successfully */
> - if (!dmux->rx) {
> - bam_dmux_pc_vote(dmux, false);
> - return -ENXIO;
> - }
> -
> - /* Request TX channel if necessary */
> - if (dmux->tx)
> - return 0;
> -
> - dmux->tx = dma_request_chan(dev, "tx");
> - if (IS_ERR(dmux->tx)) {
> - dev_err(dev, "Failed to request TX DMA channel: %pe\n", dmux->tx);
> - dmux->tx = NULL;
> + ret = bam_dmux_request_tx(dmux);
> + if (ret)
> bam_dmux_runtime_suspend(dev);
> - return -ENXIO;
> - }
>
> - return 0;
> + return ret;
> }
>
> static int bam_dmux_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> struct bam_dmux *dmux;
> - int ret, pc_ack_irq, i;
> unsigned int bit;
> + bool pc_state;
> + int ret, i;
>
> dmux = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*dmux), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!dmux)
> @@ -780,9 +899,9 @@ static int bam_dmux_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (dmux->pc_irq < 0)
> return dmux->pc_irq;
>
> - pc_ack_irq = platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, "pc-ack");
> - if (pc_ack_irq < 0)
> - return pc_ack_irq;
> + dmux->pc_ack_irq = platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, "pc-ack");
> + if (dmux->pc_ack_irq < 0)
> + return dmux->pc_ack_irq;
>
> dmux->pc = devm_qcom_smem_state_get(dev, "pc", &bit);
> if (IS_ERR(dmux->pc))
> @@ -799,6 +918,9 @@ static int bam_dmux_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> init_waitqueue_head(&dmux->pc_wait);
> init_completion(&dmux->pc_ack_completion);
> complete_all(&dmux->pc_ack_completion);
> + ret = devm_mutex_init(dev, &dmux->power_lock);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
>
> spin_lock_init(&dmux->tx_lock);
> INIT_WORK(&dmux->tx_wakeup_work, bam_dmux_tx_wakeup_work);
> @@ -817,31 +939,40 @@ static int bam_dmux_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> pm_runtime_use_autosuspend(dev);
> pm_runtime_enable(dev);
>
> - ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(dev, pc_ack_irq, NULL, bam_dmux_pc_ack_irq,
> - IRQF_ONESHOT, NULL, dmux);
> + ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(dev, dmux->pc_ack_irq, NULL,
> + bam_dmux_pc_ack_irq,
> + IRQF_ONESHOT | IRQF_NO_AUTOEN,
> + NULL, dmux);
> if (ret)
> goto err_disable_pm;
>
> ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(dev, dmux->pc_irq, NULL, bam_dmux_pc_irq,
> - IRQF_ONESHOT, NULL, dmux);
> + IRQF_ONESHOT | IRQF_NO_AUTOEN, NULL, dmux);
> if (ret)
> - goto err_disable_pm;
> + goto err_power_off;
>
> + mutex_lock(&dmux->power_lock);
> ret = irq_get_irqchip_state(dmux->pc_irq, IRQCHIP_STATE_LINE_LEVEL,
> - &dmux->pc_state);
> - if (ret)
> - goto err_disable_pm;
> + &pc_state);
> + if (ret) {
> + mutex_unlock(&dmux->power_lock);
> + goto err_power_off;
> + }
>
> /* Check if remote finished initialization before us */
> - if (dmux->pc_state) {
> - if (bam_dmux_power_on(dmux))
> - bam_dmux_pc_ack(dmux);
> - else
> - bam_dmux_power_off(dmux);
> - }
> + bam_dmux_handle_pc(dmux, pc_state);
> + mutex_unlock(&dmux->power_lock);
> +
> + /* Start handling state changes after the initial state is processed. */
> + enable_irq(dmux->pc_ack_irq);
> + enable_irq(dmux->pc_irq);
>
> return 0;
>
> +err_power_off:
> + mutex_lock(&dmux->power_lock);
> + bam_dmux_power_off(dmux);
> + mutex_unlock(&dmux->power_lock);
> err_disable_pm:
> pm_runtime_disable(dev);
> pm_runtime_dont_use_autosuspend(dev);
> @@ -872,12 +1003,16 @@ static void bam_dmux_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> pm_runtime_set_suspended(dev);
>
> /* Try to wait for remote side to drop power vote */
> - if (!wait_event_timeout(dmux->pc_wait, !dmux->rx, BAM_DMUX_REMOTE_TIMEOUT))
> + if (!wait_event_timeout(dmux->pc_wait, !READ_ONCE(dmux->rx),
> + BAM_DMUX_REMOTE_TIMEOUT))
> dev_err(dev, "Timed out waiting for remote side to suspend\n");
>
> /* Make sure everything is cleaned up before we return */
> + disable_irq(dmux->pc_ack_irq);
Beyond all the sashiko comments, this patch is quite big and should
be split in smaller chunck to help reviewers.
I.e. the above line looks like a separate fix, deserving
it's own patch.
/P
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-10 10:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-03 18:00 [PATCH net v5] net: wwan: qcom_bam_dmux: fix TX DMA channel use-after-free Hongyan Xu
2026-09-09 9:03 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-10 10:20 ` Paolo Abeni [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=30dc9ad2-0ff7-4d97-8b01-ab2267fb56b8@redhat.com \
--to=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=getshell@seu.edu.cn \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=loic.poulain@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ryazanov.s.a@gmail.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stephan@gerhold.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).