From: Jiayuan Chen <jiayuan.chen@linux.dev>
To: Rishikesh Jethwani <rjethwani@purestorage.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@kernel.org>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2 0/2] kcm: don't sleep in softirq when the lower socket uses kTLS
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2026 18:13:19 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3108e934-ec00-458b-8720-450554b35b55@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261016025059.289202-1-rjethwani@purestorage.com>
On 10/16/26 10:44 AM, Rishikesh Jethwani wrote:
> When a TCP socket with software kTLS RX is attached to a KCM mux,
Can we just reject such combo ?
> psock_data_ready() calls strp_data_ready() from softirq, which calls the
> socket's read_sock(). For kTLS that is tls_sw_read_sock(), which can
> sleep, and CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP reports it on every run of a
> loopback reproducer.
>
> Patch 1 is the fix: KCM parses inline only when read_sock is
> tcp_read_sock() and otherwise defers to the strparser work, which runs
> under lock_sock(). It applies and builds on its own, including on
> stable kernels.
>
> Patch 2 addresses review feedback on v1 and is needed by patch 1.
> kstrp, the workqueue that deferred work runs on, is an ordered
> workqueue shared by every strparser user (KCM, sockmap, espintcp,
> ovpn). With patch 1 alone, a KCM psock decrypting kTLS records in
> software on kstrp would delay parsing and message timeouts for every
> other strparser socket on the system. Patch 2 makes kstrp per-CPU. It
> has no Fixes tag: the ordered workqueue is as old as strparser, and it
> only becomes a real problem for KCM over kTLS with patch 1.
>
> Other strparser users are not affected by the bug fixed in patch 1:
> espintcp is itself a TCP ULP and cannot be combined with kTLS, ovpn
> installs its own ops built from inet_stream_ops, and sockmap reads
> through tcp_bpf_strp_read_sock() and is mutually exclusive with kTLS
> RX (do_tls_setsockopt_conf() rejects sockets with a psock).
>
> Testing: with patch 1, 5/5 runs of the reproducer produce no splat and
> full datagram delivery; without it every run hits "BUG: sleeping
> function called from invalid context" in strp_data_ready ->
> tls_sw_read_sock. Multi-record messages (>16 KiB each) also deliver
> completely with kTLS RX installed before the KCM attach and the whole
> stream queued before the reader starts. With patch 2, test_sockmap and the ovpn TCP selftests
> pass, strparser work runs concurrently across sockets, and dmesg shows
> no warnings.
>
> v2:
> - add patch 2 (kstrp per-CPU), per review
> - read sock->ops with READ_ONCE(), pairing with update_sk_prot()
>
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20261013033920.2069285-1-rjethwani@purestorage.com/
>
> Rishikesh Jethwani (2):
> kcm: defer receive parsing when the lower socket's read_sock may sleep
> strparser: don't serialize all parser work on one ordered workqueue
>
> net/kcm/kcmsock.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> net/strparser/strparser.c | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-16 10:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-16 2:44 [PATCH net v2 0/2] kcm: don't sleep in softirq when the lower socket uses kTLS Rishikesh Jethwani
2026-10-16 2:44 ` [PATCH net v2 1/2] kcm: defer receive parsing when the lower socket's read_sock may sleep Rishikesh Jethwani
2026-10-16 2:44 ` [PATCH net v2 2/2] strparser: don't serialize all parser work on one ordered workqueue Rishikesh Jethwani
2026-10-16 2:54 ` [PATCH net v2 0/2] kcm: don't sleep in softirq when the lower socket uses kTLS netdev-bot+sinfo
2026-10-16 4:29 ` Rishikesh Jethwani
2026-10-16 10:13 ` Jiayuan Chen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3108e934-ec00-458b-8720-450554b35b55@linux.dev \
--to=jiayuan.chen@linux.dev \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@kernel.org \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=rjethwani@purestorage.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox