From: "Henrik Lindström" <lindstrom515@gmail.com>
To: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Cc: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>,
davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: macvtap performs IP defragmentation, causing MTU problems for virtual machines
Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2023 19:25:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3259970.44csPzL39Z@pc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231004080037.GC15013@breakpoint.cc>
On onsdag 4 oktober 2023 10:00:37 CEST Florian Westphal wrote:
> Can you submit this formally, with proper changelog and Signed-off-by?
> See scripts/checkpatch.pl in the kernel tree.
Sure, i can give it a shot. How do i properly credit you if i submit your
patch with some small changes of my own?
> You could also mention in changelog that this is ipv4 only because
> ipv6 already considers the interface index during reassembly.
Interesting. I've been trying to understand the code and it seems like
ipv6 does defragmentation per-interface, while ipv4 does it "per-vrf"
(correct me if i'm wrong). Is there any reason for this difference?
I also did some more testing with the diff from my previous mail. It
looks like the problem remains for interfaces under vrfs. I think simply
doing the bcast/mcast check first fixes that though, something like this:
if (skb->pkt_type == PACKET_BROADCAST || skb->pkt_type == PACKET_MULTICAST) {
if (dev)
return dev->ifindex;
}
return l3mdev_master_ifindex_rcu(dev);
Does that look reasonable?
The idea being that bcast/mcast packets are always defragmented
per-interface, and unicast packets always "per-vrf".
Thanks,
Henrik
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-05 17:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-30 16:00 macvtap performs IP defragmentation, causing MTU problems for virtual machines Henrik Lindström
2023-10-02 9:20 ` Florian Westphal
2023-10-02 18:49 ` Henrik Lindström
2023-10-04 8:00 ` Florian Westphal
2023-10-05 17:25 ` Henrik Lindström [this message]
2023-10-06 6:06 ` Florian Westphal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3259970.44csPzL39Z@pc \
--to=lindstrom515@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).