From: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>
To: Yury Norov <ynorov@nvidia.com>,
David Laight <david.laight.linux@gmail.com>
Cc: "Yury Norov (NVIDIA)" <yury.norov@gmail.com>,
Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
<intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] ice: use bitmap_weighted_xor() in ice_find_free_recp_res_idx()
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2026 14:50:13 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <32680f88-dcb5-487a-b001-93c26edc80dc@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aZtD8klexMFal8GI@yury>
On 2/22/2026 9:59 AM, Yury Norov wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 23, 2025 at 07:08:46PM +0000, David Laight wrote:
>> On Tue, 23 Dec 2025 11:23:01 -0500
>> "Yury Norov (NVIDIA)" <yury.norov@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Use the right helper and save one bitmaps traverse.
>>
>> It makes no difference here.
>
> No it makes.
>
>> The bitmap has 48 entries and is just a single 'long' on 64bit.
>> It is also already in a very slow path that has iterated all the
>> 'set' bit of two bitmaps.
>>
>> The code is also pretty convoluted and confusing already.
>> One of the other bitmaps has 64 entries, recoding using u64 would
>> make it a bit more readable.
>>
>> Doing the 'weight' here is also just optimising for failure.
>
> We've introduced bitmap_weighted_or() recently, and now we need to add
> siblings to the new sub-class. Regardless of performance impact in this
> case, having a dedicated helper for a typical operations saves a lot in
> debugging. This is proven by decades of code development.
I agree, performance issues aside, I could see the utility in having a
combined helper. It makes is a little cleaner and removes a point for
introducing problems. Assuming there are no objections, could you resend
the series? It'll be easier than digging back to get these.
Thanks,
Tony
>> Oh, and using u8 and u16 for function parameters, return values and
>> maths requires extra instructions and is usually a bad idea.
>
> Changing function signatures is not the patch purpose. Feel free to
> submit a separate patch.
>
>> Dvaid
>>
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Yury Norov (NVIDIA) <yury.norov@gmail.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_switch.c | 4 +---
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_switch.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_switch.c
>>> index 84848f0123e7..903417477929 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_switch.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_switch.c
>>> @@ -4984,10 +4984,8 @@ ice_find_free_recp_res_idx(struct ice_hw *hw, const unsigned long *profiles,
>>> hw->switch_info->recp_list[bit].res_idxs,
>>> ICE_MAX_FV_WORDS);
>>>
>>> - bitmap_xor(free_idx, used_idx, possible_idx, ICE_MAX_FV_WORDS);
>>> -
>>> /* return number of free indexes */
>>> - return (u16)bitmap_weight(free_idx, ICE_MAX_FV_WORDS);
>>> + return (u16)bitmap_weighted_xor(free_idx, used_idx, possible_idx, ICE_MAX_FV_WORDS);
>>> }
>>>
>>> /**
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-24 22:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-23 16:22 [PATCH 0/3] ice: use better bitmap API Yury Norov (NVIDIA)
2025-12-23 16:23 ` [PATCH 1/3] bitmap: introduce bitmap_weighted_xor() Yury Norov (NVIDIA)
2025-12-23 16:23 ` [PATCH 2/3] ice: use bitmap_weighted_xor() in ice_find_free_recp_res_idx() Yury Norov (NVIDIA)
2025-12-23 19:08 ` David Laight
2026-02-22 17:59 ` Yury Norov
2026-02-24 22:50 ` Tony Nguyen [this message]
2025-12-23 16:23 ` [PATCH 3/3] ice: use bitmap_empty() in ice_vf_has_no_qs_ena Yury Norov (NVIDIA)
2026-02-22 18:00 ` [PATCH 0/3] ice: use better bitmap API Yury Norov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=32680f88-dcb5-487a-b001-93c26edc80dc@intel.com \
--to=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=david.laight.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com \
--cc=ynorov@nvidia.com \
--cc=yury.norov@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox