From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rick Jones Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] documentation: Document issues with VMs and XPS and drivers enabling it on their own Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2016 09:26:35 -0700 Message-ID: <32d356cc-a7c7-2349-88a5-ab4652272ba1@hpe.com> References: <20160825225543.BFA562900836@tardy> <20160826.213550.1069021753459989756.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Linux Kernel Network Developers , Alexander Duyck To: Tom Herbert , David Miller Return-path: Received: from g4t3428.houston.hpe.com ([15.241.140.76]:31837 "EHLO g4t3428.houston.hpe.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753682AbcH2Q0h (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Aug 2016 12:26:37 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 08/27/2016 12:41 PM, Tom Herbert wrote: > On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 9:35 PM, David Miller wrote: >> From: Tom Herbert >> Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 16:43:35 -0700 >> >>> This seems like it will only confuse users even more. You've clearly >>> identified an issue, let's figure out how to fix it. >> >> I kinda feel the same way about this situation. > > I'm working on XFS (as the transmit analogue to RFS). We'll track > flows enough so that we should know when it's safe to move them. Is the XFS you are working on going to subsume XPS or will the two continue to exist in parallel a la RPS and RFS? rick jones