From: "Ruinskiy, Dima" <dima.ruinskiy@intel.com>
To: Sasha Neftin <sasha.neftin@intel.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>, Ricky Wu <en-wei.wu@canonical.com>
Cc: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <rickywu0421@gmail.com>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <edumazet@google.com>,
<intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org>, <kuba@kernel.org>,
<anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>, <pabeni@redhat.com>,
<davem@davemloft.net>,
"Lifshits, Vitaly" <vitaly.lifshits@intel.com>,
naamax.meir <naamax.meir@linux.intel.com>,
"Avivi, Amir" <amir.avivi@intel.com>,
"Keller, Jacob E" <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v2 2/2] e1000e: fix link fluctuations problem
Date: Thu, 9 May 2024 12:13:27 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <334396b5-0acc-43f7-b046-30bcdab1b6fb@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <514e990b-50c6-419b-96f2-09c3d04a2fda@intel.com>
On 08/05/2024 8:05, Sasha Neftin wrote:
> On 07/05/2024 15:31, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>> On Fri, May 03, 2024 at 06:18:36PM +0800, Ricky Wu wrote:
>>> As described in https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218642,
>>> Intel I219-LM reports link up -> link down -> link up after hot-plugging
>>> the Ethernet cable.
>>
>> Please could you quote some parts of 802.3 which state this is a
>> problem. How is this breaking the standard.
>>
>> Andrew
>
> In I219-* parts used LSI PHY. This PHY is compliant with the 802.3 IEEE
> standard if I recall correctly. Auto-negotiation and link establishment
> are processed following the IEEE standard and could vary from platform
> to platform but are not violent to the IEEE standard.
>
> En-Wei, My recommendation is not to accept these patches. If you think
> there is a HW/PHY problem - open a ticket on Intel PAE.
>
> Sasha
I concur. I am wary of changing the behavior of some driver
fundamentals, to satisfy a particular validation/certification flow, if
there is no real functionality problem. It can open a big Pandora box.
Checking the Bugzilla report again, I am not sure we understand the
issue fully:
[ 143.141006] e1000e 0000:00:1f.6 enp0s31f6: NIC Link is Up 1000 Mbps
Half Duplex, Flow Control: None
[ 143.144878] e1000e 0000:00:1f.6 enp0s31f6: NIC Link is Down
[ 146.838980] e1000e 0000:00:1f.6 enp0s31f6: NIC Link is Up 1000 Mbps
Full Duplex, Flow Control: None
This looks like a very quick link "flap", following by proper link
establishment ~3.7 seconds later. These ~3.7 seconds are in line of what
link auto-negotiation would take (auto-negotiation is the default mode
for this driver). The first print (1000 Mbps Half Duplex) actually makes
no sense - it cannot be real link status since 1000/Half is not a
supported speed. So it seems to me that actually the first "link up" is
an incorrect/incomplete/premature reading, not the "link down".
--Dima
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-09 9:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-03 10:18 [PATCH v2 2/2] e1000e: fix link fluctuations problem Ricky Wu
2024-05-07 12:31 ` Andrew Lunn
2024-05-08 5:05 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Sasha Neftin
2024-05-09 9:13 ` Ruinskiy, Dima [this message]
2024-05-09 13:46 ` Andrew Lunn
2024-05-09 17:40 ` En-Wei WU
2024-05-10 9:55 ` Sasha Neftin
2024-05-10 12:32 ` Andrew Lunn
2024-05-13 6:04 ` Sasha Neftin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=334396b5-0acc-43f7-b046-30bcdab1b6fb@intel.com \
--to=dima.ruinskiy@intel.com \
--cc=amir.avivi@intel.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=en-wei.wu@canonical.com \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=jacob.e.keller@intel.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=naamax.meir@linux.intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=rickywu0421@gmail.com \
--cc=sasha.neftin@intel.com \
--cc=vitaly.lifshits@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).