From: Duoming Zhou <duoming@zju.edu.cn>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kuba@kernel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com,
alexander.deucher@amd.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
broonie@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linma@zju.edu.cn,
Duoming Zhou <duoming@zju.edu.cn>
Subject: [PATCH net v5 1/2] nfc: replace improper check device_is_registered() in netlink related functions
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2022 09:14:32 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <33a282a82c18f942f1f5f9ee0ffcb16c2c7b0ece.1651194245.git.duoming@zju.edu.cn> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1651194245.git.duoming@zju.edu.cn>
In-Reply-To: <cover.1651194245.git.duoming@zju.edu.cn>
The device_is_registered() in nfc core is used to check whether
nfc device is registered in netlink related functions such as
nfc_fw_download(), nfc_dev_up() and so on. Although device_is_registered()
is protected by device_lock, there is still a race condition between
device_del() and device_is_registered(). The root cause is that
kobject_del() in device_del() is not protected by device_lock.
(cleanup task) | (netlink task)
|
nfc_unregister_device | nfc_fw_download
device_del | device_lock
... | if (!device_is_registered)//(1)
kobject_del//(2) | ...
... | device_unlock
The device_is_registered() returns the value of state_in_sysfs and
the state_in_sysfs is set to zero in kobject_del(). If we pass check in
position (1), then set zero in position (2). As a result, the check
in position (1) is useless.
This patch uses bool variable instead of device_is_registered() to judge
whether the nfc device is registered, which is well synchronized.
Fixes: 3e256b8f8dfa ("NFC: add nfc subsystem core")
Signed-off-by: Duoming Zhou <duoming@zju.edu.cn>
---
Changes in v5:
- Replace device_is_registered() to bool variable.
include/net/nfc/nfc.h | 1 +
net/nfc/core.c | 26 ++++++++++++++------------
2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/net/nfc/nfc.h b/include/net/nfc/nfc.h
index 5dee575fbe8..7bb4ccb1830 100644
--- a/include/net/nfc/nfc.h
+++ b/include/net/nfc/nfc.h
@@ -167,6 +167,7 @@ struct nfc_dev {
int n_targets;
int targets_generation;
struct device dev;
+ bool dev_register;
bool dev_up;
bool fw_download_in_progress;
u8 rf_mode;
diff --git a/net/nfc/core.c b/net/nfc/core.c
index dc7a2404efd..52147da2286 100644
--- a/net/nfc/core.c
+++ b/net/nfc/core.c
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ int nfc_fw_download(struct nfc_dev *dev, const char *firmware_name)
device_lock(&dev->dev);
- if (!device_is_registered(&dev->dev)) {
+ if (!dev->dev_register) {
rc = -ENODEV;
goto error;
}
@@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ int nfc_dev_up(struct nfc_dev *dev)
device_lock(&dev->dev);
- if (!device_is_registered(&dev->dev)) {
+ if (!dev->dev_register) {
rc = -ENODEV;
goto error;
}
@@ -142,7 +142,7 @@ int nfc_dev_down(struct nfc_dev *dev)
device_lock(&dev->dev);
- if (!device_is_registered(&dev->dev)) {
+ if (!dev->dev_register) {
rc = -ENODEV;
goto error;
}
@@ -207,7 +207,7 @@ int nfc_start_poll(struct nfc_dev *dev, u32 im_protocols, u32 tm_protocols)
device_lock(&dev->dev);
- if (!device_is_registered(&dev->dev)) {
+ if (!dev->dev_register) {
rc = -ENODEV;
goto error;
}
@@ -246,7 +246,7 @@ int nfc_stop_poll(struct nfc_dev *dev)
device_lock(&dev->dev);
- if (!device_is_registered(&dev->dev)) {
+ if (!dev->dev_register) {
rc = -ENODEV;
goto error;
}
@@ -291,7 +291,7 @@ int nfc_dep_link_up(struct nfc_dev *dev, int target_index, u8 comm_mode)
device_lock(&dev->dev);
- if (!device_is_registered(&dev->dev)) {
+ if (!dev->dev_register) {
rc = -ENODEV;
goto error;
}
@@ -335,7 +335,7 @@ int nfc_dep_link_down(struct nfc_dev *dev)
device_lock(&dev->dev);
- if (!device_is_registered(&dev->dev)) {
+ if (!dev->dev_register) {
rc = -ENODEV;
goto error;
}
@@ -401,7 +401,7 @@ int nfc_activate_target(struct nfc_dev *dev, u32 target_idx, u32 protocol)
device_lock(&dev->dev);
- if (!device_is_registered(&dev->dev)) {
+ if (!dev->dev_register) {
rc = -ENODEV;
goto error;
}
@@ -448,7 +448,7 @@ int nfc_deactivate_target(struct nfc_dev *dev, u32 target_idx, u8 mode)
device_lock(&dev->dev);
- if (!device_is_registered(&dev->dev)) {
+ if (!dev->dev_register) {
rc = -ENODEV;
goto error;
}
@@ -495,7 +495,7 @@ int nfc_data_exchange(struct nfc_dev *dev, u32 target_idx, struct sk_buff *skb,
device_lock(&dev->dev);
- if (!device_is_registered(&dev->dev)) {
+ if (!dev->dev_register) {
rc = -ENODEV;
kfree_skb(skb);
goto error;
@@ -552,7 +552,7 @@ int nfc_enable_se(struct nfc_dev *dev, u32 se_idx)
device_lock(&dev->dev);
- if (!device_is_registered(&dev->dev)) {
+ if (!dev->dev_register) {
rc = -ENODEV;
goto error;
}
@@ -601,7 +601,7 @@ int nfc_disable_se(struct nfc_dev *dev, u32 se_idx)
device_lock(&dev->dev);
- if (!device_is_registered(&dev->dev)) {
+ if (!dev->dev_register) {
rc = -ENODEV;
goto error;
}
@@ -1134,6 +1134,7 @@ int nfc_register_device(struct nfc_dev *dev)
dev->rfkill = NULL;
}
}
+ dev->dev_register = true;
device_unlock(&dev->dev);
rc = nfc_genl_device_added(dev);
@@ -1166,6 +1167,7 @@ void nfc_unregister_device(struct nfc_dev *dev)
rfkill_unregister(dev->rfkill);
rfkill_destroy(dev->rfkill);
}
+ dev->dev_register = false;
device_unlock(&dev->dev);
if (dev->ops->check_presence) {
--
2.17.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-29 1:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-29 1:14 [PATCH net v5 0/2] Replace improper checks and fix bugs in nfc subsystem Duoming Zhou
2022-04-29 1:14 ` Duoming Zhou [this message]
2022-04-29 7:03 ` [PATCH net v5 1/2] nfc: replace improper check device_is_registered() in netlink related functions Greg KH
2022-04-29 7:19 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-04-29 9:18 ` duoming
2022-04-29 1:14 ` [PATCH net v5 2/2] nfc: nfcmrvl: main: reorder destructive operations in nfcmrvl_nci_unregister_dev to avoid bugs Duoming Zhou
2022-04-29 7:27 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-04-29 9:13 ` duoming
2022-05-02 6:34 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-05-02 7:25 ` duoming
2022-05-04 6:32 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-05-04 9:07 ` duoming
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=33a282a82c18f942f1f5f9ee0ffcb16c2c7b0ece.1651194245.git.duoming@zju.edu.cn \
--to=duoming@zju.edu.cn \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linma@zju.edu.cn \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).