Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next v4 0/5] iavf: Add devlink and devlink rate support'

[Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>]

On Fri, 2023-12-15 at 12:06 +0100, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> 1) AFAICS devlink (and/or devlink_port) does not have fine grained, per
> queue representation and intel want to be able to configure shaping on
> per queue basis. I think/hope we don't want to bring the discussion to
> extending the devlink interface with queue support, I fear that will
> block us for a long time. Perhaps I’m missing or misunderstanding
> something here. Otherwise in retrospect this looks like a reasonable
> point to completely avoid devlink here.

Note to self: never send a message to the ML before my 3rd morning
coffee.

This thread started with Intel trying to using devlink rate for their
use-case, apparently slamming my doubt above.

My understanding is that in the patches the queue devlink <> queue
relationship was kept inside the driver and not exposed to the devlink
level.

If we want to use the devlink rate api to replace e.g.
ndo_set_tx_maxrate, we would need a devlink queue(id) or the like,
hence this point.

Cheer,

Paolo