From: Simon Farnsworth <simon@farnz.org.uk>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Dan Williams <dcbw@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pppoe: Use workqueue to die properly when a PADT is received
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 11:17:26 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3411251.Z29qxOyJF6@f19simon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1424381068-22252-1-git-send-email-simon@farnz.org.uk>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1871 bytes --]
Michal's e-mail as listed in MAINTAINERS is bouncing (he's listed as PPPoE
maintainer).
If anyone has alternate contact details for him, please let him know that
his kernel-related e-mail is bouncing.
The relevant chunk of MAINTAINERS is:
PPP OVER ETHERNET
M: Michal Ostrowski <mostrows@earthlink.net>
S: Maintained
F: drivers/net/ppp/pppoe.c
F: drivers/net/ppp/pppox.c
If I don't hear from him in the next couple of weeks, I'll send the trivial
patch to remove PPP OVER ETHERNET from maintained status.
On Thursday 19 February 2015 21:24:28 Simon Farnsworth wrote:
> When a PADT frame is received, the socket may not be in a good state to
> close down the PPP interface. The current implementation handles this by
> simply blocking all further PPP traffic, and hoping that the lack of traffic
> will trigger the user to investigate.
>
> Use schedule_work to get to a process context from which we clear down the
> PPP interface, in a fashion analogous to hangup on a TTY-based PPP
> interface. This causes pppd to disconnect immediately, and allows tools to
> take immediate corrective action.
>
> Signed-off-by: Simon Farnsworth <simon@farnz.org.uk>
> ---
> Note that I'm not subscribed to netdev; please cc me on any replies.
>
> The patch falls out of https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=742939
> I'm trying to get NetworkManager back to using kernel PPPoE partly because
> it performs a little better, and mostly because kernel PPPoE copes with
> larger MTUs than userspace PPPoE.
>
> Dan Williams (cc'd) has tested a previous version of this patch; the
> differences to this version are only cosmetic.
>
> drivers/net/ppp/pppoe.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
> include/linux/if_pppox.h | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
<snip patch>
--
Simon Farnsworth
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 473 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-20 12:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-19 21:24 [PATCH] pppoe: Use workqueue to die properly when a PADT is received Simon Farnsworth
2015-02-20 11:17 ` Simon Farnsworth [this message]
2015-02-20 13:25 ` Christoph Schulz
2015-02-20 16:10 ` Christoph Schulz
2015-02-20 16:41 ` Simon Farnsworth
2015-02-20 19:49 ` Christoph Schulz
2015-02-20 21:04 ` Simon Farnsworth
2015-02-22 2:58 ` David Miller
2015-02-20 17:05 ` Dan Williams
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3411251.Z29qxOyJF6@f19simon \
--to=simon@farnz.org.uk \
--cc=dcbw@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).