From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bert Kenward Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] sfc: remove napi_hash_del() call Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 14:15:05 +0000 Message-ID: <346f2de7-ef32-e60f-fe1d-d2eae0071636@solarflare.com> References: <1479304907.8455.171.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev , Edward Cree To: Eric Dumazet , David Miller Return-path: Received: from nbfkord-smmo01.seg.att.com ([209.65.160.76]:30213 "EHLO nbfkord-smmo01.seg.att.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753187AbcKPO1L (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Nov 2016 09:27:11 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1479304907.8455.171.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 16/11/16 14:01, Eric Dumazet wrote: > From: Eric Dumazet > > Calling napi_hash_del() after netif_napi_del() is pointless. > > Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet > Cc: Edward Cree > Cc: Bert Kenward > --- > drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx.c | 5 ++--- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) Acked-by: Bert Kenward