From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: ecree@xilinx.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-net-drivers@amd.com
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
edumazet@google.com, habetsm.xilinx@gmail.com,
marcelo.leitner@gmail.com, Edward Cree <ecree.xilinx@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 1/3] netlink: add support for formatted extack messages
Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2022 15:35:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <34a347be9efca63a76faf6edca6e313b257483b6.camel@sipsolutions.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a01a9a1539c22800b2a5827cf234756f13fa6b97.1665147129.git.ecree.xilinx@gmail.com>
> +#define NL_SET_ERR_MSG_FMT(extack, fmt, args...) do { \
> + struct netlink_ext_ack *__extack = (extack); \
> + \
> + scnprintf(__extack->_msg_buf, NETLINK_MAX_FMTMSG_LEN, \
> + (fmt), ##args); \
Maybe that should print some kind of warning if the string was longer
than the buffer? OTOH, I guess the user would notice anyway, and until
you run the code nobody can possibly notice ... too bad then?
Maybe we could at least _statically_ make sure that the *format* string
(fmt) is shorter than say 60 chars or something to give some wiggle room
for the print expansion?
/* allow 20 chars for format expansion */
BUILD_BUG_ON(strlen(fmt) > NETLINK_MAX_FMTMSG_LEN - 20);
might even work? Just as a sanity check.
> + do_trace_netlink_extack(__extack->_msg_buf); \
> + \
> + if (__extack) \
> + __extack->_msg = __extack->_msg_buf; \
That "if (__extack)" check seems a bit strange, you've long crashed with
a NPD if it was really NULL?
johannes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-07 13:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-07 13:25 [RFC PATCH net-next 0/3] netlink: formatted extacks ecree
2022-10-07 13:25 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 1/3] netlink: add support for formatted extack messages ecree
2022-10-07 13:35 ` Johannes Berg [this message]
2022-10-07 13:46 ` Edward Cree
2022-10-07 13:49 ` Johannes Berg
2022-10-07 13:58 ` Edward Cree
2022-10-13 12:59 ` Jiri Pirko
2022-10-13 13:35 ` Edward Cree
2022-10-07 18:32 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-10-13 12:55 ` Jiri Pirko
2022-10-17 12:00 ` Edward Cree
2022-10-17 18:44 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-10-07 13:25 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 2/3] sfc: use formatted extacks instead of efx_tc_err() ecree
2022-10-07 13:25 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 3/3] sfc: remove 'log-tc-errors' ethtool private flag ecree
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=34a347be9efca63a76faf6edca6e313b257483b6.camel@sipsolutions.net \
--to=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=ecree.xilinx@gmail.com \
--cc=ecree@xilinx.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=habetsm.xilinx@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-net-drivers@amd.com \
--cc=marcelo.leitner@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).