netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
To: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 00/11] UDP/IPv6 refactoring
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2022 16:04:28 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <353b5206205cc71d25998c9601a052dade081b94.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1651071843.git.asml.silence@gmail.com>

On Thu, 2022-04-28 at 11:56 +0100, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> Refactor UDP/IPv6 and especially udpv6_sendmsg() paths. The end result looks
> cleaner than it was before and the series also removes a bunch of instructions
> and other overhead from the hot path positively affecting performance.
> 
> It was a part of a larger series, there were some perf numbers for it, see
> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/cover.1648981570.git.asml.silence@gmail.com/
> 
> Pavel Begunkov (11):
>   ipv6: optimise ipcm6 cookie init
>   udp/ipv6: refactor udpv6_sendmsg udplite checks
>   udp/ipv6: move pending section of udpv6_sendmsg
>   udp/ipv6: prioritise the ip6 path over ip4 checks
>   udp/ipv6: optimise udpv6_sendmsg() daddr checks
>   udp/ipv6: optimise out daddr reassignment
>   udp/ipv6: clean up udpv6_sendmsg's saddr init
>   ipv6: partially inline fl6_update_dst()
>   ipv6: refactor opts push in __ip6_make_skb()
>   ipv6: improve opt-less __ip6_make_skb()
>   ipv6: clean up ip6_setup_cork
> 
>  include/net/ipv6.h    |  24 +++----
>  net/ipv6/datagram.c   |   4 +-
>  net/ipv6/exthdrs.c    |  15 ++--
>  net/ipv6/ip6_output.c |  53 +++++++-------
>  net/ipv6/raw.c        |   8 +--
>  net/ipv6/udp.c        | 158 ++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
>  net/l2tp/l2tp_ip6.c   |   8 +--
>  7 files changed, 122 insertions(+), 148 deletions(-)

Just a general comment here: IMHO the above diffstat is quite
significant and some patches looks completely non trivial to me.

I think we need a quite significant performance gain to justify the
above, could you please share your performace data, comprising the
testing scenario?

Thanks!

Paolo


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-04-28 14:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-28 10:56 [PATCH net-next 00/11] UDP/IPv6 refactoring Pavel Begunkov
2022-04-28 10:56 ` [PATCH net-next 01/11] ipv6: optimise ipcm6 cookie init Pavel Begunkov
2022-04-28 14:04   ` Paolo Abeni
2022-04-28 15:27     ` Pavel Begunkov
2022-04-28 10:56 ` [PATCH net-next 02/11] udp/ipv6: refactor udpv6_sendmsg udplite checks Pavel Begunkov
2022-04-28 14:09   ` Paolo Abeni
2022-04-28 15:11     ` Pavel Begunkov
2022-04-28 10:56 ` [PATCH net-next 03/11] udp/ipv6: move pending section of udpv6_sendmsg Pavel Begunkov
2022-04-28 10:56 ` [PATCH net-next 04/11] udp/ipv6: prioritise the ip6 path over ip4 checks Pavel Begunkov
2022-04-28 10:56 ` [PATCH net-next 05/11] udp/ipv6: optimise udpv6_sendmsg() daddr checks Pavel Begunkov
2022-04-28 10:56 ` [PATCH net-next 06/11] udp/ipv6: optimise out daddr reassignment Pavel Begunkov
2022-04-28 10:56 ` [PATCH net-next 07/11] udp/ipv6: clean up udpv6_sendmsg's saddr init Pavel Begunkov
2022-04-28 10:56 ` [PATCH net-next 08/11] ipv6: partially inline fl6_update_dst() Pavel Begunkov
2022-04-28 10:56 ` [PATCH net-next 09/11] ipv6: refactor opts push in __ip6_make_skb() Pavel Begunkov
2022-04-28 10:56 ` [PATCH net-next 10/11] ipv6: improve opt-less __ip6_make_skb() Pavel Begunkov
2022-04-28 10:56 ` [PATCH net-next 11/11] ipv6: clean up ip6_setup_cork Pavel Begunkov
2022-04-28 14:04 ` Paolo Abeni [this message]
2022-04-28 15:03   ` [PATCH net-next 00/11] UDP/IPv6 refactoring Pavel Begunkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=353b5206205cc71d25998c9601a052dade081b94.camel@redhat.com \
    --to=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=asml.silence@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).