Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	marc.dionne@auristor.com, kuba@kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net,
	edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com,
	linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	stable@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v3 11/14] afs: Create a server appdata key
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2026 22:48:04 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <358858.1784756884@warthog.procyon.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260720145356.195862-1-horms@kernel.org>

Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org> wrote:

> [Severity: High]
> Does this toksize calculation omit the 4 bytes required for the level field? 
> 
> It looks like the sizes added up correspond to starttime (8), lifetime (4),
> bytelife (4), and expirationtime (8).
> 
> If the level field is omitted, toksize will be 4 bytes too small.

Yeah.

> Can this manual advance of the xdr pointer hide the token size mismatch?
>
> Because xdr is advanced based on the miscalculated encsize rather than the
> actual number of fields written, it appears this will bypass the adatasize
> sanity check on the next line.

As it happens, the encryption padding hides the problem.

> When crypto_krb5_encrypt() executes, it seems it will only process the
> truncated toksize bytes of plaintext. This would leave the trailing 4 bytes
> of the serialized XDR unencrypted and overwritten by the appended Kerberos
> checksum. 

The buffer is sized and padded out by crypto_krb5_how_much_buffer() and
kzalloc() preclears it, so crypto_krb5_encrypt() happens to work correctly
most of the time as the data it encrypts is rounded out to a whole encryption
blocks.

David


  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-22 21:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-13  8:10 [PATCH net v3 00/14] rxrpc: Fix CHALLENGE packet handling David Howells
2026-07-13  8:10 ` [PATCH net v3 01/14] rxrpc: Fix sendmsg to not return an error if last packet queued David Howells
2026-07-13  8:10 ` [PATCH net v3 02/14] afs: Fix UAF when sending a message David Howells
2026-07-13  8:10 ` [PATCH net v3 03/14] afs: Fix afs_fs_fetch_data() to set call->async David Howells
2026-07-13  8:10 ` [PATCH net v3 04/14] rxrpc: Fix packet encryption error handling David Howells
2026-07-20 14:52   ` Simon Horman
2026-07-23  8:41     ` David Howells
2026-07-13  8:10 ` [PATCH net v3 05/14] rxrpc: Fix update of call->tx_pending without holding lock David Howells
2026-07-13  8:10 ` [PATCH net v3 06/14] rxrpc: Fix generation of notifications after call completion David Howells
2026-07-13  8:10 ` [PATCH net v3 07/14] afs: Simplify call refcounting David Howells
2026-07-20 14:52   ` Simon Horman
2026-07-13  8:10 ` [PATCH net v3 08/14] afs: Make afs_put_call() take trace argument David Howells
2026-07-13  8:10 ` [PATCH net v3 09/14] afs: Fix UAF in afs_make_call() David Howells
2026-07-13  8:10 ` [PATCH net v3 10/14] keys: Add refcounting to user-defined key type payload David Howells
2026-07-13  8:10 ` [PATCH net v3 11/14] afs: Create a server appdata key David Howells
2026-07-20 14:53   ` Simon Horman
2026-07-22 21:48     ` David Howells [this message]
2026-07-13  8:10 ` [PATCH net v3 12/14] rxrpc: Pass appdata key to rxrpc_call and thence to rxrpc_bundle David Howells
2026-07-20 14:54   ` Simon Horman
2026-07-13  8:10 ` [PATCH net v3 13/14] rxrpc: Fix CHALLENGE packet overqueuing and simplify RESPONSE generation David Howells
2026-07-20 14:54   ` Simon Horman
2026-07-13  8:10 ` [PATCH net v3 14/14] rxrpc: Remove OOB challenge/response code David Howells
2026-07-20 14:56   ` Simon Horman
2026-07-23  8:30     ` David Howells
2026-07-21 22:28 ` [PATCH net v3 00/14] rxrpc: Fix CHALLENGE packet handling Jakub Kicinski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=358858.1784756884@warthog.procyon.org.uk \
    --to=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-afs@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marc.dionne@auristor.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=stable@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox