From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (lindbergh.monkeyblade.net [23.128.96.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 27A7D1ED49 for ; Tue, 13 Jun 2023 19:05:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sender3-op-o19.zoho.com (sender3-op-o19.zoho.com [136.143.184.19]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 08FF41721; Tue, 13 Jun 2023 12:04:55 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1686683036; cv=none; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; b=YXjH8Hp6GiPPqOr9BmzuWiRGXaYXwG04v4JHck3+NkBNyrjZcu3w9X2llCQ2CKm1HKxdNEN9Q7NpmLAAolGYGGuw734ARxBgBMQq3gry4JicEyh94RdMqacv63ONtXx5omJDqjSbLdOWcLdtVkfAwk30Ptdo7aoCuE9wA/hwiUA= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; t=1686683036; h=Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Date:From:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Message-ID:References:Subject:To; bh=SzAqxLkMC4vpkZH2u8f1C/rpQPJMstHdNpojeB7TZMs=; b=jYCHE1Pv9JQboLFV3wq2mgyP5ZMUixqjGXG0JJhjM7kNIqBlaGy6AACdR4AyRp8m6oDP60S2hxFUEPUEZpMANyFRSRaVF5tVHjovkwLK8muzwECUZYSLCmOjxqxeYDJPYKyKIQ6toPw8YixD+0oPDBnST+KLmAtbJTAZiltaS/Q= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.zohomail.com; dkim=pass header.i=arinc9.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arinc.unal@arinc9.com; dmarc=pass header.from= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1686683036; s=zmail; d=arinc9.com; i=arinc.unal@arinc9.com; h=Message-ID:Date:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:Subject:To:To:Cc:Cc:References:From:From:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-Id:Reply-To; bh=SzAqxLkMC4vpkZH2u8f1C/rpQPJMstHdNpojeB7TZMs=; b=GLSs/6iiEbhuHIXTB3tNw+tiXHp1DwdF8dfmGhm7vs9VEAncIhA4v9aLimQ719xQ YCuW+Aqxvd3TSb0UtFCQopJCJr0YGXIHvsw1GiKtC4mXtiIcWdaOl5c9cHvVFTM7NfW a4CrA8BKYOkLGtlzZCUutwm6hqpNEAqRsfYWeJYI= Received: from [192.168.1.248] (178-147-169-233.haap.dm.cosmote.net [178.147.169.233]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 16866830338181009.996857118617; Tue, 13 Jun 2023 12:03:53 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <359d0825-e39a-8a12-ebbf-b8d7e941d1ef@arinc9.com> Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2023 22:03:44 +0300 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.11.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2 2/7] net: dsa: mt7530: fix trapping frames with multiple CPU ports on MT7530 Content-Language: en-US To: Jakub Kicinski Cc: Vladimir Oltean , Daniel Golle , Landen Chao , DENG Qingfang , Sean Wang , Andrew Lunn , Florian Fainelli , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Matthias Brugger , AngeloGioacchino Del Regno , Russell King , Frank Wunderlich , Bartel Eerdekens , mithat.guner@xeront.com, erkin.bozoglu@xeront.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org References: <20230611081547.26747-1-arinc.unal@arinc9.com> <20230611081547.26747-2-arinc.unal@arinc9.com> <20230613150815.67uoz3cvvwgmhdp2@skbuf> <20230613171858.ybhtlwxqwp7gyrfs@skbuf> <20230613172402.grdpgago6in4jogq@skbuf> <20230613173908.iuofbuvkanwyr7as@skbuf> <20230613111218.0e1b3e9f@kernel.org> From: =?UTF-8?B?QXLEsW7DpyDDnE5BTA==?= In-Reply-To: <20230613111218.0e1b3e9f@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-ZohoMailClient: External X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,NICE_REPLY_A,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net On 13.06.2023 21:12, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Tue, 13 Jun 2023 20:58:33 +0300 Arınç ÜNAL wrote: >>> Ok. I see Russell has commented on v4, though I don't see that he particularly >>> pointed out that this fixes a problem which isn't yet a problem. I got lost in >>> all the versions. v2 and v3 are out of my inbox now :) >> >> All good, I had to quickly roll v3 as v2 had wrong author information >> and I couldn't risk getting v2 applied. > > FWIW you can reply with pw-bot: changes-requested to your own patches > and the bot should discard them from patchwork. > > https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/next/process/maintainer-netdev.html#updating-patch-status > > It's a new capability that nobody has used, yet, so YMMV :) Interesting, I've got some questions regarding this. > For example to mark a series as Changes Requested one needs to send the following line anywhere in the email thread: > > pw-bot: changes-requested I suppose a reply to the cover letter or under the cover letter thread applies? > The use of the bot is restricted to authors of the patches (the From: header on patch submission and command must match!) So, for example, if this patch series was new, Vladimir would reply to the patch they're the author of with 'pw-bot: changes-requested', and the patchworks would mark the whole patch series as changes requested? Arınç