From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Venkat Yekkirala Subject: RE: [PATCH 0/3] Fix for IPsec leakage with SELinux enabled - V.03 Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 17:07:59 -0400 Message-ID: <36282A1733C57546BE392885C0618592015CFB5B@chaos.tcs.tcs-sec.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, selinux@tycho.nsa.gov, jmorris@namei.org, sds@tycho.nsa.gov, eparis@redhat.com, johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au Return-path: Received: from tcsfw4.tcs-sec.com ([65.127.223.133]:34196 "EHLO tcsfw4.tcs-sec.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751362AbWJEVIR (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Oct 2006 17:08:17 -0400 To: David Miller , Venkat Yekkirala Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org > > This version takes into account David Miller's comments > > regarding treatment of security layer errors in the case > > of socket policies. Specifically, these errors will be > > treated like how these kind of errors are treated for > > the main/sub policies, which is to return a full lookup > > failure. > > I only have patches "1" and "3" in my inbox, did you forget > to send the second one out or are they simply misnumbered? > My apologies. The second one is also numbered 1, but has the following distinct subject line: [PATCH 1/3] Fix for IPsec leakage with SELinux enabled - V.03: Fix xfrm code