From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Martin J. Bligh" Subject: Re: networking bugs and bugme.osdl.org Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 23:08:12 -0700 Sender: linux-net-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <37590000.1056780491@[10.10.2.4]> References: <20030626.224739.88478624.davem@redhat.com><21740000.1056724453@[10.10.2.4]><20030627.143738.41641928.davem@redhat.com><20030627213153.GR501@phunnypharm.org><20030627162527.714091ce.akpm@digeo.com><35240000.1056760723@[10.10.2.4]><20030627181432.61bf6f3a.akpm@digeo.com><36630000.1056766403@[10.10.2.4]> <20030627193521.25040f3e.akpm@digeo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: bcollins@debian.org, davidel@xmailserver.org, davem@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-net@vger.kernel.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com Return-path: To: Andrew Morton In-Reply-To: <20030627193521.25040f3e.akpm@digeo.com> Content-Disposition: inline List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org > If some low-value stuff leaks through then ho-hum, at least it was > on-topic. It is not as if we are unused to low-value content... ;-) > It would be good if pure administrata such as changing the status were > filtered. That should be easy enough. > In fact, there is probably no point in sending anything bugzilla->list apart > from the initial report. If the bug is then pursued via bugzilla then OK. > If is is pursued via email then bugzilla just captures the discussion. OK, but I'm pretty much doing that already. I try to filter out some of the "bugs with no content". So it sounds like the issue is more the loop from email back in. Will see what I can get done - have to schedule some time from the admins. >> 2. email back in. >> >> Email back in is harder, and needs more thought as to how to make it >> easy to use, whilst avoiding logging crap (eg. ensuing flamewars that >> derive from the bug reports, etc). > > Well hopefully people will have the sense to cut the bugzilla address off > the Cc line if it drifts off-topic. Fairy nuff. >> My intuition is to log replies by >> default, and hack off certain threads by hand > > Nah. Just log everything and hack off the crap by larting people. Heh. need to get a good "remote slap protocol" implemented. Perhaps the net guys can write us an RFC for it ;-) M.