From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC perf,bpf 1/5] perf, bpf: Introduce PERF_RECORD_BPF_EVENT
Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2018 10:08:07 -0700
Message-ID: <37d2c7a8-fe99-94bd-9b8f-24e9ca9fa39c@gmail.com>
References: <20181106205246.567448-1-songliubraving@fb.com>
 <20181106205246.567448-2-songliubraving@fb.com>
 <20181107084057.GG9781@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <31067290-4B66-4AA1-8027-607397BC0264@fb.com>
 <20181108150028.GU9761@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <C858C862-E523-4CE8-AB39-CC9B27BE2538@fb.com>
 <d5043aae-69b0-fd49-e82a-5a13834a3f32@gmail.com>
 <050ABAC6-6C3B-4B6B-BB68-727127E00B51@fb.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Kernel Team <Kernel-team@fb.com>,
        "ast@kernel.org" <ast@kernel.org>,
        "daniel@iogearbox.net" <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
        "acme@kernel.org" <acme@kernel.org>
To: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <050ABAC6-6C3B-4B6B-BB68-727127E00B51@fb.com>
Content-Language: en-US
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

On 11/8/18 11:49 AM, Song Liu wrote:
> Could you please point me to more information about the use cases you worry 
> about? I am more than happy to optimize the logic for those use cases. 

bpf load and unload as just another tracepoint to throw into a set of
events that are monitored. As mentioned before auditing the loads and
unloads is one example.

And that brings up another comment: Why are you adding a PERF_RECORD_*
rather than a tracepoint? From what I can see the PERF_RECORD_BPF_EVENT
definition does not include the who is loading / unloading a bpf
program. That is important information as well.