From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Neftin, Sasha" <sasha.neftin@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH] net: intel: e1000e: use new api
 ethtool_{get|set}_link_ksettings
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2017 15:24:52 +0200
Message-ID: <388fcd93-2c4e-4dc6-db3c-2c1d361f032a@intel.com>
References: <1485465593-12561-1-git-send-email-tremyfr@gmail.com>
 <eec980e8-ecee-182b-f438-edef32932b6a@intel.com>
 <CAC=8w93gHe60SXwHXn5OsJZkMfgO=BneEr63yzDvB_WAzsU=Fg@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com, davem@davemloft.net,
        netdev@vger.kernel.org, intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
To: Philippe Reynes <tremyfr@gmail.com>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAC=8w93gHe60SXwHXn5OsJZkMfgO=BneEr63yzDvB_WAzsU=Fg@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

On 2/1/2017 00:01, Philippe Reynes wrote:
> Hi Sasha,
>
> On 1/31/17, Neftin, Sasha <sasha.neftin@intel.com> wrote:
>> Philippe,
>>
>> We will look into and try test this patch. I would like ask question. I
>> see that this thread has been started from implementation for e1000
>> code. Why do you decide shift implementation to e1000e?
> I've just sent two patch for two drivers (e1000 and e1000e).
>
>
>> Sasha
>>
>>
> Philippe

Hello Philippe,

Great. We are responsible for e1000e. We will check patch for e1000e.

Sasha