From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Adam Langley" Subject: Re: MD5 SG fix Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2008 17:07:54 -0700 Message-ID: <396556a20807031707u26276f7dx8787f8b23d050087@mail.gmail.com> References: <396556a20805301217k293e5718h6bbf02bfe0683152@europa> <396556a20805301217k293e5718h6bbf02bfe0683153@europa> <20080702045555.GB11252@2ka.mipt.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Stephen Hemminger" , netdev@vger.kernel.org To: "Evgeniy Polyakov" Return-path: Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com ([209.85.198.232]:38029 "EHLO rv-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752895AbYGDAHy (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Jul 2008 20:07:54 -0400 Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id k40so1243867rvb.1 for ; Thu, 03 Jul 2008 17:07:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20080702045555.GB11252@2ka.mipt.ru> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 9:55 PM, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote: > Why dont't you want to iterate over all provided data/page pointers with > crypto_hash_update() and do not mess with huge scatterlist arrays? You're right, it's easier that way. I was just stuck in the thinking of the original code. Stephen: I managed to test the SG stuff by setting up lo in jumbo frames mode, so no need to test it on your BGP stuff. Cheers, AGL -- Adam Langley agl@imperialviolet.org http://www.imperialviolet.org