From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Subject: Re: [PATCH][BLUETOOTH] kill bt_sock_alloc Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2005 14:43:54 -0300 Message-ID: <39e6f6c7050309094379d155e@mail.gmail.com> References: <20050308094937.GA9468@conectiva.com.br> <20050308095209.GB9468@conectiva.com.br> <422F33E9.4030401@qualcomm.com> Reply-To: acme@conectiva.com.br Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: marcel@holtmann.org, davem@davemloft.net, netdev@oss.sgi.com To: Max Krasnyansky In-Reply-To: <422F33E9.4030401@qualcomm.com> Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Wed, 09 Mar 2005 09:35:37 -0800, Max Krasnyansky wrote: > Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > Em Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 06:49:37AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu: > > > >>Hi, > >> > >> Please take a look and if acceptable pull from: > >> > >>bk://kernel.bkbits.net/acme/connection_sock-2.6 > > > > > > Sorry, now with the patch attached. > > Looks good to me. Marcel I'd suggest for you to apply this patch. > It helps in reducing overall size of the socket structures. Please note that there are further space savings to tap into in the bt_sock class hierarchy, as not all of the bt_sock descendants needs things like bt_sock::accept_q, etc And when the "kill sk_protinfo" series is finished, there will be further space savings, as the same bt_sock descendants that don't use accept_q will not need to have struct connection_sock in its definition. -- - Arnaldo