From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Subject: Re: [NET] make all protos partially use sk_prot Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2005 10:13:31 -0300 Message-ID: <39e6f6c705032605136bd797b2@mail.gmail.com> References: <20050326003937.GA13951@conectiva.com.br> <1111842541.9195.183.camel@pegasus> Reply-To: acme@conectiva.com.br Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , "David S. Miller" , Network Development Mailing List To: Marcel Holtmann In-Reply-To: <1111842541.9195.183.camel@pegasus> Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Sat, 26 Mar 2005 14:09:01 +0100, Marcel Holtmann wrote: > Hi Arnaldo, > > > Please take a look and apply if acceptable, full description is > > on the changeset. > > > > Ah, I started using __ as a separator between class name and > > method, I've been using this in some client projects and find it useful > > for grepping and for ctags, as it eliminates some false positives and > > do namespacing more strongly, please tell me if you don't like it. > > > > If this is accepted the next changesets probably will move > > struct proto and the proto__ routines to net/core/prot.{c,h} and I'll > > add proto__ prefix to all struct proto members, etc. > > I personally don't like the __ separator thing. Is this really needed? > What is wrong with using "proto_register()"? Where is the advantage? Well, I stated it above, but if there are strong feelings like yours, I'll humbly retract that > And please don't convert from using "err" to "rc" for the return value > of the init function. In the case of the Bluetooth subsystem we never > call these variables "rc" and thus you are messing things up. Consistency, but again, strong feelings, so I'll rework the patch removing the __ and removing the style changes I did to your subsystem. Regards, - Arnaldo