From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo" Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: wan/pc300 bug found] Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 12:56:02 -0200 Message-ID: <39e6f6c70611140656s38e21b0eic3c259ed13170c57@mail.gmail.com> References: <4559D5BF.3080605@garzik.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Krzysztof Halasa" , "Francois Romieu" , "Netdev List" Return-path: Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com ([66.249.82.227]:57811 "EHLO wx-out-0506.google.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965909AbWKNO4D (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Nov 2006 09:56:03 -0500 Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s7so1196615wxc for ; Tue, 14 Nov 2006 06:56:02 -0800 (PST) To: "Jeff Garzik" In-Reply-To: <4559D5BF.3080605@garzik.org> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On 11/14/06, Jeff Garzik wrote: > FYI... I'm certainly willing to remove pc300, if nobody wants it. > > But I am unsure whether this is a case of "vendor doesn't care" or > "users don't care", which are two very different things... Well, I'm not a user of such card, but I know there are many users at least here in Brazil, I guess it should stay. - Arnaldo